This comprehensive report, updated on October 27, 2025, evaluates SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) through the investment lens of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger. Our analysis delves into five key areas—Business & Moat, Financial Statements, Past Performance, Future Growth, and Fair Value—while benchmarking the company against peers like Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP), United Community Banks, Inc. (UCBI), and First Bancorp (FBNC).
Mixed.
SmartFinancial has successfully grown its assets to $5.3B through acquisitions.
The bank's core business shows strength, with net interest income growing by 21.1% year-over-year.
However, this growth has not resulted in consistent profits, as earnings have been volatile.
The bank is also less efficient than many competitors and its loan loss reserves appear thin.
Currently, the stock seems fairly valued and faces limited prospects for strong organic growth.
Investors might find better opportunities elsewhere until the bank improves its profitability.
US: NASDAQ
SmartFinancial, Inc., operating as SmartBank, is a community bank with a business model centered on relationship-based banking. The company's core operations involve gathering deposits from individuals and small-to-medium-sized businesses and then using that capital to provide a range of lending products within its key markets of East and Middle Tennessee, Alabama, and the Florida Panhandle. Its primary revenue source is net interest income, the spread between the interest it earns on loans and the interest it pays on deposits. The bank's main product lines can be segmented into three key areas: Commercial Lending (including Commercial Real Estate and Commercial & Industrial loans), Retail Lending (primarily residential mortgages and consumer loans), and Deposit Services (checking, savings, and time deposits). Together, these functions represent the vast majority of the bank's activities and revenue generation, positioning it as a classic community financial institution that thrives on local market knowledge and customer service.
The most significant part of SmartFinancial's business is its Commercial Lending portfolio, which makes up over 80% of its total loans. This is split mainly between Commercial Real Estate (CRE) loans, at ~64% of the portfolio, and Commercial and Industrial (C&I) loans at ~12%. CRE lending, the dominant product, targets local developers and business owners for properties like offices, retail spaces, and multi-family housing. The US CRE lending market is valued in the trillions, but it is highly fragmented and intensely competitive, with community banks, regional players, and national institutions all vying for business. Profit margins, dictated by the bank's net interest margin, have been under pressure industry-wide due to rising funding costs. SmartFinancial competes with larger regional banks like Pinnacle Financial Partners and First Horizon, as well as a host of smaller community banks in its territories. These competitors often have greater scale or deeper local roots. The primary consumers are local business owners and real estate investors who value personalized service and quicker, localized decision-making. The stickiness of these relationships can be high, as switching a business's primary banking relationship, which often includes loans, deposit accounts, and treasury services, is a significant undertaking. However, the moat for this service is narrow; it's based almost entirely on personal relationships rather than a unique product or cost advantage. The bank's heavy concentration in CRE poses a significant risk, as this sector is highly sensitive to economic downturns and interest rate changes, making this core product line a point of vulnerability.
Deposit gathering is the foundational service that fuels SmartFinancial's lending operations. The bank offers a standard suite of products, including noninterest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit (CDs). These deposits represent 100% of the bank's funding for its loans. The market for deposits is extremely competitive, encompassing not just physical banks but also online-only banks and credit unions that often offer higher interest rates. The profit margin on deposits is essentially the inverse of their cost; a lower cost of funds directly translates to a higher net interest margin for the bank. Competitors range from national giants like Bank of America to digital players like Ally Bank. SmartFinancial's target customers are the same individuals and small businesses in its local footprint. Stickiness is highest for primary checking accounts, where direct deposits and automatic payments create significant hurdles to switching. However, for savings and CDs, customers are more rate-sensitive and less sticky. The bank’s competitive position here is mixed. While its local branch network fosters relationship-based deposit gathering, it has a growing reliance on higher-cost CDs, which comprised over 30% of deposits in early 2024. This indicates a weakening ability to attract and retain low-cost core deposits, which is the primary moat for a community bank. The bank's advantage is limited to its physical presence, as it lacks the scale or technology to compete on price or digital experience with larger or more specialized institutions.
Finally, SmartFinancial generates a smaller portion of its revenue from Fee-Based Services, which represented less than 17% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2024. These services include service charges on deposit accounts, debit card interchange fees, and mortgage banking income. While this income is not the primary driver, it provides a source of revenue that is not dependent on interest rates, offering a buffer when lending margins are compressed. The market for these services is mature, with competition on every front, from fintech companies offering fee-free banking to large national players with sophisticated wealth management and payment processing platforms. The bank's fee income streams are not highly differentiated and face constant competitive pressure. The customers are its existing retail and business deposit holders. The stickiness is tied to the underlying deposit account, but the services themselves do not create a strong, independent moat. The bank's lack of a substantial or unique fee-generating business, such as a large wealth management or insurance division, is a notable weakness. This low level of noninterest income makes the bank's overall business model more vulnerable to fluctuations in interest rates compared to more diversified peers. This dependency on net interest income, combined with the competitive pressures on both its lending and deposit-gathering activities, underscores a business model that is solid but lacks a deep or durable competitive moat. The bank's success is therefore highly dependent on disciplined execution and the economic health of its specific geographic markets.
SmartFinancial's recent performance highlights a strong ability to generate core earnings, a crucial trait for any bank. In its most recent quarter, the company reported a 22.2% year-over-year increase in revenue, largely driven by a 21.1% rise in net interest income. This growth is supported by a robust net interest margin (NIM), which we calculate at a healthy 3.55%. This indicates the bank is effectively managing the spread between what it earns on loans and what it pays for deposits. Profitability metrics are solid and improving, with Return on Assets (ROA) reaching 0.97% and Return on Equity (ROE) hitting 10.35%, placing it in line with well-regarded industry benchmarks.
From a balance sheet perspective, the company appears resilient and prudently managed. The loan-to-deposit ratio stood at a healthy 83.6% in the last quarter, suggesting that lending activities are well-funded by a stable base of customer deposits rather than more volatile borrowings. Capital levels are adequate, with the tangible common equity to total assets ratio at 7.65%. A significant strength is the bank's limited exposure to interest rate risk in its securities portfolio. The negative impact of unrealized losses on its tangible equity is a minimal -2.44%, far better than many peers and a sign of strong asset-liability management.
However, there are areas that warrant investor caution. The bank's efficiency ratio, a measure of cost control, was 63.8% in the most recent quarter. While this is an improvement from prior periods, it remains higher than the sub-60% level typically associated with highly efficient banks. A more significant red flag is the level of reserves set aside for potential loan losses. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans is 0.92%, which is somewhat thin compared to industry norms that are often above 1.0%. This could leave the bank more exposed if the economic environment deteriorates and loan defaults begin to rise. Critical data points, such as the level of nonperforming loans and uninsured deposits, were not available, which creates blind spots for a complete risk assessment.
Overall, SmartFinancial's financial foundation appears stable, anchored by strong core earnings power and prudent liquidity management. The bank is successfully navigating the current interest rate environment to grow its income. The primary risks lie in its below-average loan loss reserves and a cost structure that, while improving, is not yet best-in-class. The financial statements paint a picture of a solid community bank that is performing well operationally, but with a risk profile that is not without its weaknesses.
Over the last five fiscal years (FY2020-FY2024), SmartFinancial has executed a strategy of aggressive balance sheet growth, yet its earnings quality and shareholder returns have been inconsistent. The bank's total assets expanded at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 12.5%, driven by a series of acquisitions that also fueled strong loan and deposit growth of over 13% annually. This expansion demonstrates management's ability to execute deals and integrate new operations. However, this top-line growth has been overshadowed by volatility in its bottom-line performance, raising questions about the profitability of its acquired assets and its ability to manage costs effectively through different economic cycles.
From a growth and profitability standpoint, the record is uneven. Revenue grew at a solid 4-year CAGR of 11.5% from $107.6 million in FY2020 to $166.4 million in FY2024. In contrast, earnings per share (EPS) growth was a more modest 7.3% CAGR over the same period and was extremely choppy, with annual changes ranging from a 37% increase to a 34% decrease. This inconsistency is reflected in the bank's profitability metrics. Its Return on Equity (ROE) has fluctuated, averaging around 8% over the last five years, a level considered mediocre for the banking industry. Similarly, its Return on Assets (ROA) has struggled to stay near the 1.0% benchmark that typically signifies a high-performing bank, lagging significantly behind competitors like Pinnacle Financial Partners and First Bancorp.
The bank's cash flow has been reliable, with operating cash flow remaining positive throughout the period, comfortably supporting capital expenditures and dividends. SmartFinancial has established a strong track record of dividend growth, increasing its annual payout per share from $0.20 in 2020 to $0.32 by 2023. The payout ratio remains very low, suggesting the dividend is safe and has room to grow. However, capital allocation has also led to shareholder dilution, with shares outstanding increasing from approximately 15 million to 17 million over the five years to fund acquisitions, a trend that share buybacks have not fully offset. This contrasts with the superior total shareholder returns delivered by more efficient and profitable peers.
In conclusion, SmartFinancial's historical record shows a company that is proficient at growing its physical footprint but struggles with translating that scale into consistent, high-quality earnings. While the steady growth in loans, deposits, and dividends is a positive sign of a healthy core franchise, the volatile EPS and subpar profitability metrics indicate that the bank has not yet achieved the operational excellence of its top competitors. The past performance suggests a management team skilled in M&A but facing challenges in optimizing profitability and cost control across its larger organization.
The regional and community banking industry is navigating a period of significant change, with the next 3-5 years likely to be defined by consolidation, technological adoption, and margin pressure. The primary driver of change is the persistent 'higher-for-longer' interest rate environment, which has intensified competition for deposits and squeezed net interest margins (NIMs), the core profit engine for banks like SmartFinancial. This pressure forces smaller banks to seek scale through mergers to absorb rising compliance and technology costs, with industry M&A activity expected to accelerate after a recent lull. The US banking M&A market, while slow in 2023 with deals valued at around $3.9 billion, is poised for a rebound as valuation gaps narrow. Another key shift is the rapid customer adoption of digital banking, reducing the importance of physical branches and requiring significant investment in online and mobile platforms to remain competitive. Regulatory scrutiny on capital levels and liquidity, particularly for banks with significant commercial real estate (CRE) exposure, will also shape strategy, potentially limiting aggressive loan growth.
Catalysts for demand in the next 3-5 years include sustained economic growth in key regions like the Southeast, where SmartFinancial operates, which could boost loan demand from small and medium-sized businesses. A potential easing of interest rates could also reinvigorate mortgage and real estate lending. However, the competitive landscape will only intensify. Entry into the market for new banks is difficult due to high regulatory hurdles and capital requirements, but competition from non-bank fintech lenders, credit unions, and large national banks with superior technology budgets is growing fiercer. Community banks can no longer rely solely on personal relationships; they must compete on digital convenience and price. The overall market for regional bank lending is projected to grow at a modest CAGR of 2-4%, making market share gains a zero-sum game that will favor banks with a clear strategic advantage in either cost of funds, niche lending, or technology.
SmartFinancial's primary growth engine is its Commercial Lending portfolio, heavily concentrated in Commercial Real Estate (CRE). Today, consumption is constrained by high interest rates, which have increased the cost of borrowing for developers and businesses, slowing new projects and transaction volumes. Furthermore, intense competition from other local and regional banks for the most creditworthy borrowers limits pricing power. Over the next 3-5 years, growth in this segment will likely shift from new construction loans towards financing for existing, cash-flowing properties and a greater emphasis on Commercial & Industrial (C&I) loans to operating businesses. A potential decline in interest rates would be a major catalyst, unlocking pent-up demand for development and investment. The US CRE lending market is estimated at over $5 trillion, but growth is expected to be slow. SMBK will outperform if it can leverage its local market knowledge to identify strong C&I borrowers and maintain disciplined underwriting in CRE. However, larger competitors like Pinnacle Financial Partners have greater scale and can offer more sophisticated treasury services, potentially winning larger business relationships. The risk of a downturn in the CRE market, particularly in the office sector, remains a significant threat to SMBK due to its loan concentration, making this a medium-probability risk that could lead to higher credit losses and stalled growth.
Deposit gathering, the fuel for the bank's lending, faces a challenging future. Currently, consumption of traditional low-cost deposit products (like noninterest-bearing checking) is constrained by the availability of high-yield alternatives from online banks and money market funds, which offer savers rates of 5% or more. This has forced SmartFinancial to rely more on higher-cost Certificates of Deposit (CDs), which now make up over 30% of its deposit base. Over the next 3-5 years, the trend of deposit outflow from smaller banks to larger institutions and money market funds may slow but is unlikely to fully reverse. The key shift will be in the channel, with digital account opening and mobile banking becoming table stakes. Growth will depend almost entirely on a bank's ability to offer competitive rates and a seamless digital experience, areas where community banks often lag. Competition is incredibly fierce, pitting SMBK against national giants like JPMorgan Chase and digital-native banks like Ally. SmartFinancial is unlikely to win on price; its success depends on maintaining and growing core relationships with local businesses that value the integration of lending and deposit services. The primary risk is continued margin compression, as a failure to attract and retain low-cost core deposits will keep funding costs elevated. This is a high-probability risk that directly impacts the bank's core profitability.
SmartFinancial's Retail Lending segment, primarily residential mortgages and consumer loans, offers a modest but stable growth opportunity. Current consumption is severely limited by high mortgage rates, which have reduced home affordability and locked existing homeowners into their current low-rate loans, stifling both purchase and refinance activity. Industry-wide mortgage originations are at multi-decade lows. Looking ahead, any significant decrease in interest rates would serve as a powerful catalyst, potentially releasing a wave of pent-up housing demand. Consumption will likely increase among first-time homebuyers in SMBK's growing Southeastern markets. The market for mortgage originations, while currently depressed at around $1.6 trillion annually, could rebound to $2.5 trillion or higher in a more favorable rate environment. Competition is fragmented, including national mortgage lenders like Rocket Mortgage, large banks, and local mortgage brokers. SMBK can win by leveraging its existing customer relationships and reputation for local service. However, it cannot compete with the scale, technology, and marketing budgets of national players. The risk is that a 'higher-for-longer' rate scenario keeps the mortgage market stagnant for years, limiting this segment's contribution to growth. This is a medium-probability risk tied directly to macroeconomic policy.
Finally, Fee-Based Services represent SmartFinancial's biggest growth opportunity and its most significant current weakness. With noninterest income making up less than 17% of revenue, the bank is highly dependent on its net interest margin. Current consumption of its fee services is limited by a basic product suite, primarily consisting of account service charges and debit card interchange fees. The bank lacks a scaled presence in more lucrative areas like wealth management or treasury management services. Over the next 3-5 years, growth must come from strategic investment in these areas. The bank could increase consumption by cross-selling wealth services to its existing small business owners or by enhancing its treasury solutions to deepen client relationships. The US wealth management market is a multi-trillion dollar industry growing at 5-7% annually. Success requires significant investment in talent and technology. Competitors are numerous and well-entrenched, from specialized registered investment advisors (RIAs) to the massive wealth divisions of large banks. A key risk is execution failure; building these services from a low base is difficult and expensive, and there is no guarantee of success. This is a high-probability risk, and a failure to diversify income will leave the bank perpetually vulnerable to interest rate cycles, limiting its long-term growth multiple.
Looking beyond specific products, SmartFinancial's future growth will be heavily influenced by its M&A strategy. For a bank of its size (~$5 billion in assets), meaningful growth is often difficult to achieve organically alone. Strategic, in-market acquisitions are the most plausible path to gaining scale, improving efficiency, and expanding its service offerings. Successful M&A could allow the bank to enter new, attractive geographies within the Southeast or acquire teams with expertise in fee-income businesses like wealth management. However, M&A carries its own risks, including overpaying for targets, difficult cultural integration, and regulatory approval hurdles. The bank's ability to identify accretive deals and successfully integrate them will be a critical determinant of its long-term shareholder returns and a key factor for investors to monitor closely.
The valuation of SmartFinancial (SMBK) suggests the stock is fairly priced, with an estimated fair value range between $32.00 and $38.00. The current price of $35.55 sits comfortably within this range, indicating limited immediate upside or downside. For regional banks, valuation primarily hinges on earnings multiples and, more importantly, the relationship between the stock price and its tangible book value, which reflects the core assets of the business.
An analysis of valuation multiples shows SMBK's Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 12.97 is within the industry peer range of 11.7x to 13.5x. More critically, its Price-to-Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) stands at 1.37x. This represents a premium to the peer average of 1.15x, but this premium is justified by the bank's solid Return on Equity (ROE) of 10.35%. A bank that can generate returns above 10% on its equity base typically commands a valuation above its tangible asset value, as it demonstrates efficient use of shareholder capital to generate profits.
While dividend analysis is often used for stable companies, it is a less reliable indicator for SMBK's total value. The company's dividend yield is low at 0.90%, and its payout ratio is an extremely conservative 11.68%. This indicates that the vast majority of earnings are being retained and reinvested into the business to fuel future growth. Therefore, the stock's value is more closely tied to its ability to grow its book value and earnings power rather than its immediate cash return to shareholders.
The valuation is sensitive to key assumptions, particularly the bank's ability to maintain its profitability. The most critical driver is its Return on Equity. If the ROE were to fall from its current level of 10.35% towards the industry average, the premium P/TBV multiple would no longer be justified, which could place significant downward pressure on the stock price. Conversely, continued earnings growth could support a higher valuation multiple over time.
Bill Ackman's investment thesis for the banking sector would focus on identifying either a simple, predictable, high-quality franchise with a dominant market position and superior returns, or a significantly underperforming institution where a clear catalyst for value realization exists. SmartFinancial, Inc. would fail to meet either criterion in 2025. With a Return on Average Assets (ROAA) around 1.0% and an efficiency ratio in the low 60s%, the bank's performance is mediocre compared to best-in-class peers who achieve ROAAs above 1.4% and efficiency ratios below 55%. While it is an underperformer, its small scale makes it an impractical target for a large activist fund like Pershing Square, which requires a much larger platform to deploy capital effectively. Ultimately, Ackman would view SMBK as a classic 'value trap'—a statistically inexpensive company that lacks the quality or catalyst needed for significant appreciation and would therefore avoid the stock. If forced to choose top regional banks, Ackman would favor ServisFirst (SFBS) for its industry-leading ROAA of over 1.6% and unparalleled efficiency, Pinnacle Financial (PNFP) for its strong brand and dominant position in high-growth markets, and Home BancShares (HOMB) for its exceptional track record of value creation through shrewd capital allocation. A decision change would only occur if SMBK were to be acquired by a superior operator at a significant, publicly announced premium.
Warren Buffett approaches banks as simple, long-term investments, prioritizing a durable, low-cost deposit franchise, disciplined lending, and efficient operations. From this viewpoint in 2025, SmartFinancial (SMBK) would be seen as an understandable but ultimately average community bank. Buffett would note its acceptable profitability, with a Return on Average Assets (ROAA) around 1.0%, but would be unimpressed when comparing it to best-in-class peers like ServisFirst (SFBS) or First Bancorp (FBNC) that consistently generate ROAAs above 1.3%. The bank's primary weakness in Buffett's eyes would be the absence of a strong competitive moat; it is consistently out-performed by larger, more efficient, and more profitable competitors, as evidenced by its efficiency ratio in the low 60s% versus peers who operate below 55%. Ultimately, Buffett invests in great businesses at fair prices, not fair businesses at cheap prices, and would therefore likely avoid SMBK in favor of a superior franchise. If forced to choose the best banks from this group, Buffett would favor ServisFirst (SFBS) for its exceptional 1.6%+ ROAA and sub-40% efficiency ratio, Home BancShares (HOMB) for its proven value creation via M&A and 1.5% ROAA, and First Bancorp (FBNC) for its consistent high-quality execution, showcasing the kind of enduring profitability he seeks. A significant drop in price to well below its tangible book value could attract a brief look, but Buffett would almost certainly still prefer to pay a fair price for one of the higher-quality competitors.
Charlie Munger would view SmartFinancial as a classic, understandable community bank, but ultimately one that falls short of the 'great business' standard he demands. He would appreciate its straightforward model of taking deposits and making loans, avoiding the complex and often foolish endeavors of larger financial institutions. However, he would be immediately concerned by its mediocre profitability metrics, such as a Return on Average Assets (ROAA) hovering around 1.0% and an efficiency ratio in the low 60s%. Munger would see these figures as signs of a company without a strong competitive moat, especially when peers like ServisFirst and Pinnacle Financial consistently generate ROAAs above 1.4%. For Munger, buying an average business at a fair price (~1.3x tangible book value) holds little appeal when truly exceptional banks exist. The takeaway for retail investors is that while SMBK is not a troubled bank, it lacks the superior operating characteristics Munger would require for a long-term investment, leading him to avoid the stock. If forced to choose the best banks, Munger would likely favor ServisFirst (SFBS) for its phenomenal efficiency and ROAA of 1.6%+, Pinnacle Financial (PNFP) for its strong brand and 1.4%+ ROAA in high-growth markets, and First Bancorp (FBNC) for its disciplined execution and 1.4% ROAA. A sustained improvement in SMBK's ROAA to above 1.3% alongside a much lower efficiency ratio could cause Munger to reconsider his position.
SmartFinancial, Inc. operates as a classic community-focused bank, primarily serving markets in Tennessee, Alabama, and the Florida Panhandle. This tight geographic focus is both a strength and a weakness. On one hand, it allows SMBK to build deep customer relationships and cultivate a loyal local depositor base, which can be less sensitive to interest rate changes than brokered deposits. This is the core of the community banking model. On the other hand, this concentration exposes the bank to the economic health of these specific regions and limits its avenues for substantial growth compared to competitors with a multi-state or national footprint.
When measured against its competition, a clear theme emerges: SMBK is a smaller, less efficient operator. Its profitability metrics, such as Return on Average Assets (ROAA), often hover around 1.0%, which is respectable but falls short of the 1.2% to 1.5% achieved by best-in-class regional banks. This gap is largely due to a lack of scale. Larger banks can spread their costs for technology, compliance, and marketing over a much larger asset base, leading to a better efficiency ratio (lower is better). SMBK's efficiency ratio, often in the low 60s%, is higher than the sub-55% ratios posted by more streamlined competitors, indicating it spends more to generate a dollar of revenue.
The strategic challenge for SmartFinancial is navigating a landscape dominated by these larger, more efficient players. While it has grown through strategic acquisitions of even smaller banks, its organic growth rate is modest. The bank's value proposition to investors hinges on its conservative underwriting, stable dividend, and a valuation that is often lower than its peers, reflected in a price-to-book ratio frequently near or slightly above 1.0x. The core question for a potential investor is whether this discount is sufficient to compensate for the lower growth and profitability profile relative to the industry leaders who command premium valuations for their superior performance.
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) represents an aspirational peer for SmartFinancial, operating as a much larger and more dynamic financial institution focused on high-growth urban markets. While both are Tennessee-based, PNFP's scale, profitability, and growth trajectory far exceed those of SMBK. The comparison highlights the significant advantages of a larger asset base and a strategic focus on more lucrative commercial banking segments. PNFP's business model is built on attracting experienced bankers and serving business clients, whereas SMBK follows a more traditional community banking path.
Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. in Business & Moat. PNFP has a much stronger brand, evidenced by consistent J.D. Power awards for customer satisfaction in the Southeast. Its switching costs are higher, driven by integrated treasury management and wealth services for businesses, making clients stickier than typical retail customers at SMBK. In terms of scale, PNFP's asset base of over $45 billion dwarfs SMBK's roughly $5 billion, providing massive economies of scale in technology and operations. This scale also contributes to a stronger network effect in its urban markets. Regulatory barriers are high for both, but PNFP's larger compliance infrastructure is better equipped to handle increasing complexity. PNFP's clear dominance in scale, brand, and specialized services makes it the winner.
Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. in Financial Statement Analysis. PNFP consistently delivers superior financial results. Its revenue growth has historically been stronger, driven by both organic loan growth and strategic expansion. While SMBK maintains a healthy Net Interest Margin (NIM), PNFP's profitability is markedly better, with a Return on Average Assets (ROAA) often exceeding 1.4% compared to SMBK's approximate 1.0%. This is a direct result of its efficiency and scale. PNFP's efficiency ratio is typically in the low 50s%, significantly better than SMBK's, which tends to be in the low 60s%. Both banks are well-capitalized, but PNFP's ability to generate higher profits on its asset base makes its financial engine more powerful.
Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. in Past Performance. Over the last five years, PNFP has provided significantly better results for shareholders. Its 5-year EPS CAGR has been in the double digits, substantially outpacing SMBK's more modest growth. This earnings power has translated into superior Total Shareholder Return (TSR), with PNFP's stock performance greatly exceeding SMBK's over 3-year and 5-year periods. In terms of risk, while PNFP's growth focus might imply higher volatility (beta), its asset quality has remained pristine, with very low non-performing asset ratios. SMBK is a less volatile, more conservative investment, but its returns have been commensurately lower. PNFP's track record of execution and value creation is clearly superior.
Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. in Future Growth. PNFP is positioned in some of the fastest-growing metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the United States, including Nashville, Atlanta, and Charlotte. This provides a strong tailwind for market demand. The bank's strategy of hiring seasoned banking teams to capture market share continues to be a powerful revenue opportunity. In contrast, SMBK operates in slower-growing, more rural markets, limiting its organic growth potential. Analyst consensus typically forecasts higher long-term earnings growth for PNFP. While SMBK can grow through small acquisitions, PNFP's organic growth engine is far more robust, giving it a decided edge.
Winner: SmartFinancial, Inc. in Fair Value. The one area where SMBK holds an advantage is its valuation. SMBK typically trades at a lower valuation multiple, with a Price-to-Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) ratio often around 1.2x-1.4x, whereas PNFP commands a premium valuation, often trading above 1.8x P/TBV. Furthermore, SMBK usually offers a higher dividend yield, which might appeal to income-focused investors. For example, SMBK's yield might be 3.5% when PNFP's is 2.5%. An investor pays a significant premium for PNFP's higher quality and growth. Therefore, on a pure price basis, SMBK appears to be the better value.
Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. over SmartFinancial, Inc. PNFP is unequivocally the stronger company, driven by its superior scale, profitability, and growth profile. Its strategic focus on high-growth urban markets and commercial clients has generated a Return on Assets consistently above 1.4%, far surpassing SMBK's 1.0%. While SMBK is a solid community bank and offers a more attractive valuation at a P/TBV of ~1.3x and a higher dividend yield, it cannot compete with PNFP's powerful earnings engine and superior shareholder returns over the past five years. The primary risk for PNFP is maintaining its execution in increasingly competitive markets, while SMBK's risk is stagnation. For investors seeking growth and quality, PNFP is the clear winner.
United Community Banks, Inc. (UCBI) is a large, well-established regional bank with a strong presence across the Southeast, making it a direct competitor to SmartFinancial in several markets. UCBI is significantly larger, with a more diversified loan portfolio and a wider range of financial services, including wealth management and insurance. The comparison reveals the benefits of scale and diversification, as UCBI has translated its size into more consistent earnings and a stronger market position than the smaller, more localized SMBK.
Winner: United Community Banks, Inc. in Business & Moat. UCBI's brand is more widely recognized across Georgia, the Carolinas, and Tennessee, built over decades and supported by a larger marketing budget. Switching costs are moderately high for both, but UCBI's broader product suite (e.g., wealth management, specialized lending) creates deeper, more entangled client relationships. The scale advantage is immense; UCBI's asset base of over $25 billion is roughly five times that of SMBK, enabling greater investment in technology and talent. This also creates a superior network effect with more branches and ATMs. Regulatory barriers are the same for both. Overall, UCBI's established brand and significant scale give it a commanding moat.
Winner: United Community Banks, Inc. in Financial Statement Analysis. UCBI consistently demonstrates stronger financial health and profitability. Its revenue streams are more diversified, with a higher percentage of non-interest income cushioning it from fluctuations in interest rates. UCBI's key profitability metric, Return on Average Assets (ROAA), is typically in the 1.2% to 1.3% range, outperforming SMBK's 1.0%. This is a direct reflection of superior cost management, as shown by an efficiency ratio that is often below 55%, a benchmark of high performance that SMBK struggles to reach. UCBI also has a strong liquidity position with a stable, low-cost deposit base. While both are well-capitalized, UCBI's ability to generate more profit from its assets makes it the financial winner.
Winner: United Community Banks, Inc. in Past Performance. Looking back over the last five years, UCBI has delivered more reliable growth and better returns. Its EPS growth, fueled by a mix of organic expansion and successful acquisitions, has been more consistent than SMBK's. This has led to a stronger Total Shareholder Return (TSR) over a 5-year horizon. In terms of risk, UCBI has a long history of conservative credit management, resulting in a low non-performing loans (NPL) ratio, often below 0.50%. While SMBK's performance has been steady, it hasn't matched the consistent value creation and lower credit risk profile demonstrated by UCBI, making UCBI the winner for past performance.
Winner: United Community Banks, Inc. in Future Growth. UCBI has more levers to pull for future growth. Its presence in key Southeastern markets like Atlanta, GA, and Greenville, SC, exposes it to stronger economic tailwinds than SMBK's more rural-focused footprint. UCBI has a proven track record of successfully integrating acquisitions, which remains a key part of its strategy for entering new markets. Analyst earnings estimates generally project a more robust growth trajectory for UCBI than for SMBK. SMBK's growth is more constrained by the economic health of its smaller communities, giving UCBI the clear advantage.
Winner: SmartFinancial, Inc. in Fair Value. SMBK's primary competitive advantage against a larger peer like UCBI lies in its valuation. SMBK almost always trades at a discount on a Price-to-Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) basis, often near 1.3x while UCBI can trade closer to 1.6x. This discount reflects the market's perception of lower growth and quality. Furthermore, SMBK typically offers a more attractive dividend yield, which can be 50 to 100 basis points higher than UCBI's. For investors strictly focused on value metrics and current income, SMBK presents a statistically cheaper option, assuming one accepts the trade-off in quality.
Winner: United Community Banks, Inc. over SmartFinancial, Inc. UCBI is the superior banking institution due to its significant advantages in scale, profitability, and diversification. Its ability to generate a higher Return on Assets (~1.25% vs. SMBK's ~1.0%) and operate more efficiently (efficiency ratio sub-55%) makes it a more powerful and resilient competitor. While SMBK is cheaper on a P/TBV basis (~1.3x vs. UCBI's ~1.6x), this valuation reflects its weaker competitive position and more limited growth prospects. The primary risk for UCBI is successfully integrating large acquisitions, while SMBK faces the risk of being outcompeted in its own backyard. For a long-term investor, UCBI's quality and consistency are worth the premium.
First Bancorp (FBNC) is a North Carolina-based bank that offers a compelling comparison to SmartFinancial as both are growing institutions with a strong focus on community banking, though FBNC is larger and has a more established track record of successful acquisitions. FBNC operates primarily in the Carolinas, giving it a different geographic focus but a similar business model centered on serving small to medium-sized businesses and local consumers. The comparison shows how a slightly larger and more acquisitive community-focused bank can achieve better financial metrics.
Winner: First Bancorp in Business & Moat. FBNC has a stronger and more established brand in the Carolinas, operating under the 'First Bank' name, which is simple and effective. Its scale is a key advantage, with an asset base of over $12 billion, more than double that of SMBK. This allows for greater operational efficiencies and a larger lending capacity. Switching costs and regulatory barriers are similar for both, typical of community banks. However, FBNC's larger branch network in its core markets creates a better network effect. The superior scale and resulting efficiencies give FBNC a stronger business moat.
Winner: First Bancorp in Financial Statement Analysis. FBNC consistently posts stronger profitability metrics than SMBK. Its Return on Average Assets (ROAA) is frequently in the 1.3% to 1.5% range, a clear sign of a high-performing bank and significantly better than SMBK's 1.0%. This is driven by both a healthy Net Interest Margin (NIM) and excellent cost control, reflected in an efficiency ratio that is often below 55%. In contrast, SMBK's efficiency ratio in the low 60s% indicates higher overhead. FBNC also has a strong history of maintaining excellent asset quality, with non-performing assets kept at very low levels. This combination of high profitability and clean books makes FBNC the financial winner.
Winner: First Bancorp in Past Performance. FBNC has a proven history of creating shareholder value through both organic growth and accretive acquisitions. Over the last five years, FBNC's EPS growth has been more robust than SMBK's, driven by its successful expansion strategy. This has led to a superior Total Shareholder Return (TSR) over most long-term periods. FBNC's management team is highly regarded for its M&A execution, a key factor in its past success. While SMBK has also grown via M&A, FBNC's deals have been larger and more impactful, solidifying its position as the winner in past performance.
Winner: First Bancorp in Future Growth. FBNC's base in the Carolinas provides access to economically vibrant markets with strong population growth, creating a favorable environment for loan and deposit growth. The bank has a clear strategy to continue expanding its footprint through disciplined acquisitions, giving it a defined path for future growth. While SMBK also pursues M&A, its target markets are generally slower-growing. Analyst expectations for FBNC's long-term earnings growth are typically higher than for SMBK, giving FBNC the edge in future prospects.
Winner: SmartFinancial, Inc. in Fair Value. Similar to other comparisons, SMBK's primary advantage is its valuation. It generally trades at a lower Price-to-Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) multiple than FBNC. For example, SMBK might trade at 1.3x P/TBV while the higher-quality FBNC trades at 1.7x. Additionally, SMBK often offers a slightly higher dividend yield. This is the classic trade-off: FBNC is the better bank, but you have to pay a premium for that quality. For a value-conscious investor, SMBK's lower entry point is more attractive on a statistical basis.
Winner: First Bancorp over SmartFinancial, Inc. FBNC is a better-performing bank across nearly every fundamental metric. Its superior profitability (ROAA > 1.3%), greater efficiency (Efficiency Ratio < 55%), and successful M&A track record make it a much stronger investment candidate. SMBK's only clear advantage is its lower valuation (P/TBV ~1.3x), but this discount does not adequately compensate for the significant gap in operational performance and growth potential. The primary risk for FBNC is a misstep in a future acquisition, while the risk for SMBK is continued underperformance relative to high-quality peers. FBNC's proven ability to execute and generate superior returns makes it the decisive winner.
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is a diversified financial services company headquartered in Mississippi with a significant presence across the Southeast, including states where SmartFinancial operates. TRMK is an older, more established institution that is larger than SMBK and offers a broader range of services, including insurance and wealth management. This comparison pits SMBK against a larger, more traditional, and more diversified competitor, highlighting the trade-offs between focus and breadth.
Winner: Trustmark Corporation in Business & Moat. Trustmark's moat is derived from its long history (founded in 1889), established brand, and diversified business lines. Its scale, with over $17 billion in assets, provides advantages SMBK lacks. A key differentiator is its diversified income stream; its insurance and wealth management divisions provide significant fee income, making it less reliant on net interest income than SMBK. This diversification creates stickier customer relationships and higher switching costs. While regulatory barriers are similar, Trustmark's broader service offering and larger scale give it a stronger overall moat.
Winner: SmartFinancial, Inc. in Financial Statement Analysis. While Trustmark is larger and more diversified, it has struggled with profitability in recent years. Its Return on Average Assets (ROAA) often lags, sometimes falling below 1.0%, which is comparable to or even slightly worse than SMBK's performance. Furthermore, Trustmark's efficiency ratio has historically been high, often in the mid-to-high 60s%, indicating a higher cost structure than many of its peers, including SMBK. While Trustmark's diversified revenue is a strength, its core banking profitability has been underwhelming. SMBK's focus on pure banking allows it to achieve similar or slightly better profitability metrics on a smaller scale, making it the narrow winner here.
Winner: Draw in Past Performance. Both Trustmark and SmartFinancial have delivered modest performance for shareholders over the last five years. Neither has produced the explosive growth of top-tier peers. TRMK's Total Shareholder Return (TSR) has been lackluster, often underperforming the regional bank index, due to its profitability challenges. SMBK's returns have also been modest. Both banks have seen their EPS growth in the low-to-mid single digits. Because neither has distinguished itself with strong past performance and both have underperformed the sector's leaders, this category is a draw.
Winner: SmartFinancial, Inc. in Future Growth. Trustmark's path to future growth appears more challenging. The bank has been focused on improving its internal operations and efficiency rather than aggressive expansion. Its legacy cost structure and slow-growing core markets present headwinds. SMBK, while also in slower-growth markets, has a more clearly defined strategy of growing through small, in-market acquisitions. This gives SMBK a clearer, albeit still modest, path to growing its earnings base. With TRMK focused inward and SMBK looking for external growth opportunities, SMBK has a slight edge in its future growth narrative.
Winner: SmartFinancial, Inc. in Fair Value. Both banks often trade at value-oriented multiples. However, due to its persistent profitability challenges, TRMK frequently trades at a lower Price-to-Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) multiple than SMBK, sometimes even below 1.1x compared to SMBK's 1.3x. Both typically offer attractive dividend yields, often in the 3.5% to 4.5% range, making them appeal to income investors. While TRMK might appear cheaper on a P/TBV basis, SMBK's slightly better profitability and cleaner growth story arguably make its valuation more attractive on a risk-adjusted basis. It's a close call, but SMBK's better operational metrics give it the edge.
Winner: SmartFinancial, Inc. over Trustmark Corporation. This is a case where smaller and more focused beats larger and more diversified. While Trustmark has the advantage of scale and a broader business model, its financial performance has been disappointing, with an ROAA that struggles to clear 1.0% and a high efficiency ratio. SmartFinancial, despite its own challenges, operates more efficiently and has a clearer strategy for growth through bolt-on acquisitions. The primary risk for Trustmark is continued operational underperformance, while the risk for SMBK is its geographic concentration. In this head-to-head matchup, SMBK's better execution on core banking fundamentals makes it the more compelling investment choice.
Based on industry classification and performance score:
SmartFinancial operates a traditional community banking model focused on lending to small businesses and individuals in Tennessee, Alabama, and Florida, funded by local deposits. The bank's strength lies in its manageable level of uninsured deposits and a branch network centered in its core markets. However, its competitive moat is limited due to a heavy reliance on higher-cost deposits, a low contribution from fee income, and a loan portfolio heavily concentrated in commercial real estate without a distinct niche. The overall investor takeaway is mixed, as the bank represents a standard community franchise facing significant competition and margin pressure without a strong, durable competitive advantage.
The bank has a very low contribution from fee income, making it highly dependent on interest rate spreads and more vulnerable to revenue volatility.
A diverse revenue stream strengthens a bank's business model, but SmartFinancial falls short in this area. In the first quarter of 2024, noninterest income was just 16.8% of total revenue, a level that is below the community bank average of around 20-25%. The fee income it does generate is from standard sources like service charges and card fees, without a meaningful contribution from more stable or high-growth areas like wealth management or trust services. This heavy reliance on net interest income (over 83% of revenue) means the bank's profitability is highly sensitive to changes in interest rates and competitive pressures on loan and deposit pricing. The lack of a significant fee income engine is a clear weakness and limits the resilience of its business model.
The bank maintains a well-diversified deposit base with low reliance on volatile brokered deposits, reflecting its community-focused business model.
SmartFinancial appears to have a granular and diversified customer deposit base, which is a key strength. The bank's filings indicate a very low reliance on brokered deposits, which are wholesale funds that can be less stable in times of stress. At the end of 2023, brokered deposits were less than 1% of total deposits, a figure that is significantly below many peers and demonstrates a commitment to relationship-based funding. While specific data on the mix of retail versus small business deposits is not detailed, the community banking model inherently serves a broad mix of local customers. This diversified funding profile, combined with a manageable level of uninsured deposits, reduces concentration risk and makes the bank less vulnerable to the rapid withdrawal of funds from a few large clients.
SmartFinancial's loan portfolio is heavily concentrated in general commercial real estate and lacks a distinct, specialized lending niche that would provide a competitive edge.
While focused on its geographic region, SmartFinancial does not demonstrate a strong franchise in a specific lending niche. Its loan portfolio is heavily weighted toward Commercial Real Estate (CRE), which constituted 64% of total loans at the end of 2023. This is a common focus for community banks but also represents a concentration risk rather than a specialized moat. The bank does not highlight significant activity in specialized areas like SBA lending, agriculture, or healthcare that would differentiate it from the many other banks competing for the same general business and real estate loans in its markets. Without a proven expertise in a less crowded or more profitable niche, the bank competes primarily on service and relationships in a commoditized lending market, limiting its pricing power and competitive differentiation.
The bank's deposit base is weakening, with a declining share of noninterest-bearing deposits and a growing reliance on higher-cost CDs, which reduces its funding cost advantage.
A key moat for a community bank is a stable, low-cost deposit base. SmartFinancial's performance on this factor is a concern. As of Q1 2024, noninterest-bearing deposits accounted for just 23.8% of total deposits, which is below the typical 25-30% average for strong community banks. Furthermore, time deposits (CDs), which are more expensive and less loyal, have grown to 30.5% of total deposits. This composition has pushed the bank's total cost of deposits up to 2.41%. While the bank benefits from having a relatively low level of uninsured deposits at around 32%, the overall trend shows a deteriorating funding mix. This reliance on higher-cost funding erodes the bank's net interest margin and signals a weakness in its ability to attract and retain sticky, low-cost core deposits.
SmartFinancial has a concentrated branch network in its core Southeastern markets, but its deposits per branch are modest, suggesting average rather than dominant local scale.
SmartFinancial operated 43 full-service branches across Tennessee, Alabama, and Florida as of early 2024. With approximately $4.2 billion in deposits, this translates to about $97.7 million in deposits per branch. This figure is in line with many community bank peers but does not stand out as a sign of superior operating leverage or market dominance in its key counties. The bank's strategy is clearly focused on its specific geographic footprint, which can be a strength, but its physical presence does not appear to provide an overwhelming advantage in deposit gathering when compared to the dense networks of its competitors in these growing markets. Without a significantly higher deposit-per-branch figure, the network's contribution to a competitive moat is limited.
SmartFinancial's recent financial statements show a company with strong core profitability and a well-managed balance sheet. Key strengths include a healthy net interest margin of around 3.55%, robust growth in net interest income (21.1% year-over-year), and a conservative loan-to-deposit ratio of 83.6%. However, concerns exist around its efficiency ratio, which at 63.8% is still above optimal levels, and its relatively thin loan loss reserves (0.92% of loans). The overall takeaway is mixed to positive; the bank's earnings engine is running well, but its defenses against potential credit losses and its cost structure could be stronger.
SmartFinancial has a strong liquidity position thanks to its excellent loan-to-deposit ratio, while its capital levels appear adequate but not exceptional.
A bank's ability to fund its loans and absorb unexpected losses is critical. SmartFinancial's liquidity appears robust, with a loan-to-deposit ratio of 83.6% ($4.22 billion in loans vs. $5.05 billion in deposits). This is comfortably within the ideal 80-90% range and indicates the bank funds its lending primarily through stable customer deposits, a conservative and reliable strategy. On the capital front, its tangible common equity to total assets ratio is 7.65%, which is an adequate buffer. While this level is acceptable, it doesn't stand out as a major strength. The analysis is limited by the absence of key regulatory figures like the CET1 ratio and data on uninsured deposits, but based on the available information, the bank's strong liquidity provides a solid foundation.
The bank's reserve for potential loan losses appears thin at just `0.92%` of total loans, which could be a significant vulnerability if economic conditions weaken.
The allowance for credit losses is a bank's rainy-day fund for bad loans. SmartFinancial's allowance was $39.07 million against a total loan portfolio of $4.22 billion, for a coverage ratio of 0.92%. This level is below what many peers hold, who often maintain reserves of 1.0% to 1.3% or higher. A lower reserve level could mean the bank is either highly confident in its loan quality or is not being conservative enough. In the most recent quarter, the provision for loan losses was a tiny $0.23 million, doing little to build this reserve. Without data on current nonperforming loans or net charge-offs, it is difficult to assess if this reserve level is adequate. However, being below the industry average represents a clear risk, as an unexpected rise in loan defaults could have a more significant impact on earnings.
The bank shows strong control over interest rate risk, with unrealized losses on its investment portfolio having a very small (`-2.44%`) and manageable impact on its tangible capital.
A key risk for banks is the value of their fixed-rate investment securities falling when interest rates rise, which can erode their capital base. This impact is measured through Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI). For SmartFinancial, the negative AOCI was just -$10.78 million against a tangible common equity of $442.56 million as of the latest quarter. This results in an AOCI to tangible equity ratio of -2.44%, which is extremely low and a significant strength. Many other banks have reported ratios of -15% to -25% or worse, indicating that SmartFinancial has managed its securities portfolio much more effectively to protect its book value from rate fluctuations. This suggests a prudent and disciplined approach to asset-liability management, which is a clear positive for investors.
The bank demonstrates excellent core earning power, driven by a strong and growing net interest margin and double-digit growth in net interest income.
Net interest income is the bedrock of a bank's profitability. SmartFinancial is performing exceptionally well here, with net interest income growing by a robust 21.1% year-over-year in its most recent quarter. This strong growth is fueled by a healthy net interest margin (NIM), which we calculate to be approximately 3.55%. A NIM of this level is strong compared to the industry average, which often hovers between 3.0% and 3.5%, and indicates the bank is successfully earning significantly more on its loans and investments than it is paying on its deposits. This powerful and growing earnings stream is a fundamental strength that supports the company's overall financial health.
While the bank is making progress on controlling costs, its efficiency ratio of `63.8%` is still higher than the industry benchmark for top-tier operational performance.
The efficiency ratio measures how much it costs a bank to generate a dollar of revenue, with lower being better. In the last quarter, SmartFinancial's ratio was 63.8%. This marks a solid improvement from 66.2% in the prior quarter and over 70% in the last fiscal year, showing management's efforts to control expenses are working. However, a ratio below 60% is typically considered the mark of a highly efficient bank. At its current level, SmartFinancial's cost structure is average and still requires more expense discipline to be considered a key strength. The positive trend is encouraging, but the bank does not yet pass the test for lean operations.
SmartFinancial's past performance presents a mixed picture for investors. The bank has successfully grown its assets, loans, and deposits at a strong pace over the last five years, primarily through acquisitions, with total assets growing from $3.3B in 2020 to $5.3B in 2024. However, this growth has not translated into consistent profitability, as earnings per share have been highly volatile, including a significant -34% drop in 2023. While the company has reliably increased its dividend, its profitability metrics and operational efficiency lag behind stronger regional peers. The investor takeaway is mixed; the bank's growth is positive, but its inconsistent earnings and weaker efficiency create risk.
SmartFinancial has demonstrated strong and consistent growth in both loans and deposits over the past five years, primarily through a series of acquisitions, while prudently managing its balance sheet.
The bank has an impressive track record of growing its core business. Gross loans expanded from $2.4 billion at the end of FY2020 to $3.9 billion at the end of FY2024, a CAGR of 13.0%. Similarly, total deposits grew from $2.8 billion to $4.7 billion over the same period, a CAGR of 13.6%. This robust growth, fueled by both organic efforts and M&A activity, shows the bank is successfully expanding its market presence.
A key indicator of prudent management is the loan-to-deposit ratio. This ratio has remained stable, moving from 85.4% in FY2020 to 83.4% in FY2024. This shows that the bank is funding its loan growth primarily with core customer deposits rather than relying on more volatile and expensive wholesale funding, which is a sign of a healthy and sustainable community banking model.
The bank's past performance shows a persistent struggle with efficiency, consistently operating with a high efficiency ratio that acts as a drag on its profitability.
A bank's efficiency ratio, which measures non-interest expenses as a percentage of revenue, is a key indicator of operational performance; a lower number is better. SmartFinancial's efficiency ratio has historically been high, trending from 62.0% in FY2020 to over 70% in FY2023 and FY2024. Ratios consistently above 60% are considered inefficient and lag well behind top-performing peers like SFBS or FBNC, which often operate in the 40s or low 50s. This elevated cost structure consumes a large portion of the bank's revenue, leaving less to fall to the bottom line.
On a more positive note, the bank's net interest margin (NIM)—a measure of loan profitability—has been relatively stable, hovering in a range of roughly 2.7% to 3.0%. While this shows decent pricing discipline, it has not been enough to overcome the high operating costs. The poor efficiency trend is a major factor explaining the bank's mediocre profitability and is a critical area for management to address.
While the bank has grown its net income over the long term, its earnings per share (EPS) path has been highly volatile, with significant year-over-year swings that suggest inconsistency.
SmartFinancial's record on earnings growth is a significant weakness. Over the past five years, EPS has been on a rollercoaster: $1.63 (FY2020), $2.23 (FY2021), $2.57 (FY2022), $1.70 (FY2023), and $2.16 (FY2024). The year-over-year growth figures of +37%, +15%, -34%, and +27% highlight a severe lack of consistency. Such volatility makes it difficult for investors to confidently assess the bank's underlying earnings power. The 3-year EPS CAGR from FY2022 to FY2024 is negative. Furthermore, the bank's average return on equity over the last three fiscal years was just under 8%, which is below the performance of higher-quality regional banks like Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) and indicates a struggle to generate strong profits for shareholders.
The bank appears to have managed credit risk adequately, as evidenced by a steady build-up in its loan loss allowance in line with its significant loan portfolio growth.
While specific data on net charge-offs and non-performing loans is not provided, we can assess credit discipline through the allowance for loan losses (ACL). The ACL as a percentage of total gross loans has increased from 0.77% in FY2020 to 0.96% in FY2024. This trend, especially the step-up after 2022, is a positive indicator of prudent risk management. Management has been proactively setting aside more capital to cover potential future losses as the loan book has grown and economic uncertainty has increased. The provision for loan losses has fluctuated annually, reflecting the needs of the growing portfolio and the economic environment, but does not show signs of severe or unexpected credit deterioration. This proactive reserving suggests that the bank is staying ahead of credit risk rather than reacting to it.
The bank has a reliable history of growing its dividend at a solid pace with a low payout ratio, but share buybacks have not been enough to prevent dilution from acquisitions over the past five years.
SmartFinancial has demonstrated a strong commitment to its dividend, which is a clear positive for income-focused investors. The annual dividend per share grew from $0.20 in FY2020 to $0.32 in FY2023 and FY2024, representing a 4-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.5%. The dividend is well-covered, with the payout ratio remaining very conservative, for instance, 15% in FY2024, which provides a high degree of safety and ample room for future increases.
However, the other side of capital returns is less impressive. The company's total shares outstanding have increased from 15.1 million at the end of FY2020 to 17.0 million by FY2024. This dilution, resulting from shares issued for acquisitions, has offset the capital returned via repurchases (e.g., -$3.19 million in FY2024). While acquisitions are part of the growth strategy, the rising share count has been a drag on per-share value creation for existing shareholders.
SmartFinancial's future growth hinges on its ability to execute disciplined acquisitions and capitalize on the economic strength of its Southeastern markets. The bank benefits from operating in growing regions, which should support modest organic loan demand. However, significant headwinds include intense competition for low-cost deposits, which pressures its net interest margin, and a glaring weakness in fee income, leaving earnings highly exposed to interest rate cycles. Without a clear strategy to diversify revenue or a distinct competitive edge, the growth outlook is mixed, relying heavily on M&A to drive shareholder value rather than superior organic performance.
The bank's presence in economically resilient Southeastern markets should support modest loan growth, though specific guidance remains conservative amid a challenging economic environment.
SmartFinancial is positioned to achieve low-to-mid single-digit loan growth, driven by the favorable economic fundamentals of its Tennessee, Alabama, and Florida markets. While management has not provided explicit loan growth guidance for the full year, its loan portfolio has shown modest growth, and its unfunded commitments provide some visibility into near-term pipeline activity. The bank's growth will likely track the broader economic expansion of its local communities rather than outperform the market significantly. The outlook is solid but not spectacular, reflecting a cautious lending environment. This factor passes because the bank is expected to grow, but investors should not expect high-octane organic growth given the competitive and economic backdrop.
With a strong capital position, SmartFinancial is well-equipped to pursue its primary growth strategy of disciplined M&A in the consolidating community bank sector.
SmartFinancial maintains a robust capital position, with a Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio comfortably above regulatory requirements, providing the necessary firepower for future acquisitions. Management has a track record of acquisitive growth and has consistently signaled its intent to be a strategic acquirer of smaller banks within its Southeastern footprint. Given the increasing pressures on smaller institutions, M&A is the most realistic path for SMBK to achieve meaningful earnings per share growth and build scale. While no major deals have been announced recently, the bank's strong capital levels and stated strategic focus position it well to act when opportunities arise. This disciplined approach to capital deployment via M&A is a credible and essential component of its future growth story.
The bank has not provided clear, forward-looking targets for branch optimization or digital user growth, indicating a lack of a defined strategy to improve operating efficiency.
SmartFinancial's future profitability growth depends on improving its efficiency, yet the company has not articulated a clear public plan for optimizing its physical branch network or aggressively growing its digital user base. Management has not announced specific targets for branch closures, consolidations, or cost savings derived from shifting customers to digital channels. While its deposits per branch of around $98 million are adequate, they don't suggest a highly productive network. Without stated goals for improving this metric or targets for digital adoption growth, it is difficult for investors to assess whether management is focused on creating a more efficient operating model for the future. This lack of a clear plan is a weakness compared to peers who are actively rightsizing their footprint.
Persistent pressure on funding costs from intense deposit competition is expected to continue weighing on the bank's net interest margin (NIM), posing a headwind to earnings growth.
The outlook for SmartFinancial's net interest margin remains challenged. The bank's funding base has shifted towards higher-cost time deposits, which now exceed 30% of total deposits, driving its cost of funds upward. In its latest earnings report, the bank reported a NIM of 3.27%, which has compressed from prior periods. Management has not provided explicit guidance for significant NIM expansion, and the competitive environment for low-cost core deposits shows no signs of abating. While some assets will reprice higher, this is unlikely to fully offset the pressure on funding costs in the near term. This ongoing margin pressure will likely cap net interest income growth, making earnings growth difficult to achieve.
The bank lacks a meaningful fee income business and has not outlined any specific, ambitious targets to grow this crucial revenue stream, leaving it overly exposed to interest rate fluctuations.
SmartFinancial's heavy reliance on net interest income is a significant structural weakness for future growth. Noninterest income consistently represents less than 20% of total revenue, well below more diversified peers. More importantly, management has not provided investors with any concrete growth targets for fee-based businesses like wealth management, treasury services, or mortgage banking. This absence of a stated strategy or quantitative goals suggests that diversifying revenue is not a top priority. Without a clear plan to build these businesses, the bank's earnings will remain highly volatile and dependent on the direction of interest rates, limiting its potential for consistent, long-term earnings growth.
SmartFinancial, Inc. appears to be fairly valued, with its key valuation multiples like Price-to-Earnings and Price-to-Tangible-Book-Value trading in line with or slightly above its regional banking peers. This modest premium is supported by the bank's solid profitability, highlighted by a Return on Equity above 10%. However, its dividend yield is low, offering little attraction for income-focused investors. The overall takeaway is neutral; the stock is not a bargain at its current price but reflects a reasonably sound and well-managed banking operation.
The stock trades at a reasonable premium to its tangible book value, which is justified by its solid profitability (Return on Equity).
Price to Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) is a primary valuation tool for banks. With a share price of $35.55 and a Tangible Book Value Per Share of $25.99, the P/TBV ratio is 1.37x. This is a premium to its net asset value, but it is warranted. The company's Return on Equity (ROE) is 10.35%, which is a healthy level of profitability. Banks that can generate returns over 10% typically command P/TBV multiples greater than 1.0x. While the 1.37x multiple is higher than the 1.15x average for regional banks, it is not excessive for a bank demonstrating consistent profitability and is well below the 2.0x or higher multiples seen in top-tier performers. This factor passes because the valuation premium is backed by fundamental performance.
The company's Price-to-Book multiple is well-aligned with its Return on Equity, indicating a rational market valuation.
A key principle in bank valuation is that a higher ROE justifies a higher P/B multiple. SmartFinancial's ROE of 10.35% and its P/B ratio of 1.12 (or 1.37x on a tangible basis) show a strong alignment. A bank earning a 10% return on its equity is creating value for shareholders, and the market is reflecting this by pricing the stock above its book value. The current 10-Year Treasury yield is around 4.0%, meaning the bank's ROE provides a significant premium over the risk-free rate. This demonstrates efficient use of shareholder capital. The relationship between profitability and valuation is logical and supports the current stock price, so this factor passes.
The stock's P/E ratios are reasonable and aligned with the industry, especially when considering its strong recent earnings growth.
The Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) P/E ratio of 12.97 and the forward P/E of 11.26 are both sensible. The forward P/E, which is based on future earnings estimates, is lower than the TTM P/E, which implies that analysts expect earnings to grow. This is supported by the impressive 50% EPS growth seen in the most recent quarter (Q3 2025). When compared to the regional banking industry's average P/E of around 11.7x to 13.5x, SMBK's valuation on an earnings basis appears fair and justifiable. This factor passes because the price paid for earnings is not excessive relative to its growth prospects and industry norms.
The dividend yield is low and the company is slightly diluting shareholders, offering a weak income and capital return profile compared to peers.
SmartFinancial's dividend yield of 0.90% is modest for an income-focused investor. Many other regional banks offer significantly higher yields, often in the 3-5% range. More importantly, the company's shares outstanding have increased slightly (+0.41% in the latest quarter), indicating shareholder dilution rather than buybacks which would return capital to shareholders. While the dividend is very safe, as shown by the extremely low payout ratio of 11.68%, the total shareholder yield (dividend yield plus buyback yield) is unattractive. This fails the test because it does not provide a compelling income stream or capital return to support the stock price.
On a relative basis, the stock offers no clear discount to its peers across key valuation and yield metrics.
When stacked against the regional banking sector, SmartFinancial does not appear cheap. Its P/E ratio of 12.97 is in the middle of the peer average range of 11.7x to 13.5x. Its P/TBV of 1.37x is above the peer average of around 1.15x. Furthermore, its dividend yield of 0.90% is considerably lower than what is available from many other banks in the sector. While the company is performing well, this analysis seeks a discount. Since SMBK trades at or above average multiples with a below-average yield, it fails to offer a compelling relative value proposition at its current price.
The primary macroeconomic risk facing SmartFinancial is the uncertain interest rate environment. While higher rates initially boosted earnings, a prolonged period of elevated rates increases the bank's own funding costs as it must pay more on customer deposits to prevent them from moving to higher-yielding alternatives. This dynamic can compress the bank's net interest margin (NIM)—the key profit metric showing the difference between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits. Additionally, the risk of an economic downturn or recession remains a major concern. A slowdown would likely increase loan delinquencies and defaults, forcing the bank to set aside more money for potential losses, which would directly reduce its bottom line. The bank's significant exposure to commercial real estate (CRE) loans makes it particularly vulnerable, as this sector is sensitive to economic cycles and changing work patterns.
Within the banking industry, SmartFinancial faces relentless competitive pressure. It competes not only with giant national banks that have vast resources for marketing and technology but also with nimble online banks and credit unions offering attractive deposit rates. This intense battle for deposits is a structural headwind that forces smaller banks like SMBK to constantly fight to retain their funding base, often at the expense of profitability. On top of this, the regulatory landscape has become more stringent following the regional banking turmoil in 2023. Increased scrutiny on capital levels, liquidity, and risk management could lead to higher compliance costs and may require the bank to operate more conservatively, potentially limiting its growth and return on equity.
From a company-specific standpoint, SmartFinancial's growth has been heavily reliant on acquisitions. While this strategy has allowed for rapid expansion, it also carries significant integration risk. Successfully merging the operations, technology, and culture of another bank is a complex and costly process, and any missteps in future deals could disrupt operations and harm financial performance. Another key risk is geographic concentration. With operations primarily centered in Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida, the bank's health is closely linked to the economic fortunes of the southeastern United States. A regional downturn in this specific area would impact SmartFinancial more severely than a bank with a more diversified national footprint, potentially leading to slower loan growth and a rise in local credit problems.
Click a section to jump