This report, last updated on October 27, 2025, provides a multi-faceted analysis of First BanCorp. (FBP), evaluating its business moat, financial health, past performance, future growth, and fair value. Our assessment benchmarks FBP against key competitors like Popular, Inc. (BPOP), Synovus Financial Corp. (SNV), and Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC), distilling key takeaways through the investment principles of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger.
Positive.
First BanCorp. demonstrates strong profitability and an excellent record of returning capital to shareholders.
The bank operates very efficiently, with a high Return on Equity that has consistently exceeded 18% since 2022.
However, its primary weakness is a heavy business concentration in the Puerto Rican economy, which presents significant risk.
Its balance sheet also shows sensitivity to interest rate changes, which has negatively impacted its tangible book value.
The stock appears modestly undervalued, trading at an attractive price-to-earnings ratio of 9.93x compared to peers.
Investors should weigh the bank's strong performance against its concentrated geographic risks.
US: NYSE
First BanCorp. (FBP), operating under the brand name FirstBank, is a financial holding company whose principal business is community and commercial banking. Its business model is centered on traditional banking activities: gathering deposits from individuals and businesses and using those funds to make loans. The company's core operations are geographically concentrated, with a dominant presence in Puerto Rico, which accounts for the vast majority of its assets and revenue. It also has a growing footprint in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands and the state of Florida. FBP's main products and services can be segmented into three primary categories: Commercial Lending, Consumer Lending, and Residential Mortgage Lending. Together, these lending activities, funded by customer deposits, form the heart of the bank's revenue generation through net interest income, which is the difference between the interest it earns on loans and the interest it pays on deposits. The bank's strategy leverages its deep community ties and significant market share in Puerto Rico to foster long-term customer relationships, creating a sticky customer base that provides a stable source of low-cost funding.
The largest and most critical segment for First BanCorp is its Commercial Lending division. This includes commercial and industrial (C&I) loans to businesses for operational needs and commercial real estate (CRE) loans for property financing. As of early 2024, the commercial loan portfolio stood at approximately $10.5 billion, representing over 60% of the bank's total loan book and serving as its primary revenue driver. The commercial lending market in Puerto Rico is highly concentrated, with FBP, Banco Popular (BPOP), and Oriental Bank (OFG) controlling a significant majority of the market share. This oligopolistic structure limits intense price competition and allows for more stable and rational lending margins compared to the highly fragmented U.S. market. The total addressable market is tied directly to the health of Puerto Rico's economy, which has shown signs of recovery but remains vulnerable to external shocks. FBP's commercial loan portfolio is well-diversified across various industries, mitigating risk from any single sector's downturn.
When compared to its primary competitors in Puerto Rico, FBP holds a strong number two position behind Banco Popular. While BPOP has a larger overall scale, FBP competes effectively by focusing on relationship-based service for small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Unlike the hyper-competitive Florida market where FBP is a smaller player facing giants like Bank of America and Truist, its position in Puerto Rico is fortified by decades of operational history and brand recognition. The typical commercial customer is a local Puerto Rican business that has banked with FirstBank for many years. The stickiness of these relationships is extremely high; switching a company's primary banking services, including operating accounts, credit lines, and treasury management, is a complex and disruptive process. This operational integration creates very high switching costs. The competitive moat for FBP's commercial lending business is its entrenched local presence and deep-seated customer relationships. This 'hometown bank' advantage, combined with the regulatory complexity of the Puerto Rican market, creates formidable barriers to entry for new competitors, securing its market position and protecting its profitability.
Consumer Lending represents another vital pillar of First BanCorp's business, encompassing auto loans, personal loans, and credit cards. This portfolio totals approximately $5.4 billion, or about 30% of the bank's total loans. This segment provides crucial diversification and generates both interest income and fee income. The consumer credit market in Puerto Rico is a mature market, with growth largely dependent on population trends and consumer confidence. Profit margins on consumer loans, particularly unsecured loans and credit cards, are generally higher than commercial loans but also carry higher credit risk. The competitive landscape is intense, featuring not only the other major banks but also a strong presence of local credit unions ('cooperativas') that often offer favorable rates to their members.
In the consumer space, FBP's main rivals remain BPOP and OFG, both of which have extensive consumer product offerings. FBP distinguishes itself through its large distribution network of branches and ATMs, making its services highly accessible across the island. The target customer is the average Puerto Rican household, seeking financing for major purchases like a vehicle or for personal consumption. Customer stickiness in this segment is more varied than in commercial banking. While a primary checking account holder is more likely to use FirstBank for a personal loan, the auto loan market is highly competitive on price, and customers frequently shop for the best rate. However, by bundling products and offering relationship-based pricing, FBP aims to increase loyalty. The moat in consumer lending stems from its brand equity and extensive physical network. For generations of Puerto Ricans, FirstBank is a household name, creating a level of trust that new entrants cannot easily replicate. This brand strength, combined with the convenience of its branch network, provides a durable advantage in attracting and retaining consumer clients.
The third key business line is Residential Mortgage Lending, which includes originating and servicing loans for homebuyers. This portfolio is roughly $1.9 billion, making up the remainder of the loan book at around 10%. This business is highly sensitive to interest rate fluctuations and the health of the housing market in both Puerto Rico and Florida. The Puerto Rican mortgage market, while smaller than mainland U.S. markets, is stable and benefits from being a core focus for the island's major banks. Competition is robust, coming from other banks as well as non-bank mortgage originators who compete aggressively on rates and fees. Profitability in this segment is driven by origination volume and the long-term income stream from servicing rights.
FBP is a leading mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, leveraging its brand and customer base to capture a significant share of purchase and refinance activity. Its competitors, BPOP and OFG, are also major players, leading to a competitive but rational market environment. The customers are individuals and families purchasing primary residences. While the initial loan origination is often a transactional, price-sensitive decision, the subsequent mortgage servicing relationship can last for decades, creating an opportunity for cross-selling other banking products. The stickiness is therefore moderate; customers may choose a lender based on the best rate but are unlikely to move their mortgage once it is in place. FBP's competitive advantage in this segment is its scale and operational efficiency within the Puerto Rican market. Being one of the largest originators and servicers on the island allows it to spread its fixed costs over a larger volume, providing a cost advantage. This operational scale, combined with its ability to source customers directly from its existing depositor base, constitutes its moat in the mortgage business.
In conclusion, First BanCorp.'s business model is that of a traditional, relationship-focused regional bank, but its competitive landscape is unique due to its concentration in Puerto Rico. Its moat is not derived from a proprietary technology or a global brand, but from the powerful, localized advantages it has cultivated over decades. The high market concentration in Puerto Rico creates a favorable operating environment with rational competition, which supports stable profitability. This deep entrenchment, characterized by a large and loyal customer base, significant brand equity, and a dense physical network, forms a protective barrier that is exceptionally difficult for outside competitors to penetrate. While the bank's fortunes are inextricably linked to the economic and political climate of Puerto Rico, this very concentration is the source of its strength and durable competitive edge.
The resilience of this business model has been tested through numerous economic cycles, including recessions and natural disasters, and has proven to be robust. The bank's expansion into Florida is a logical step to diversify its geographic risk, but its true competitive strength and long-term value proposition reside in its foundational Puerto Rican franchise. For an investor, understanding this context is critical. FBP is not just another regional bank; it is a core financial institution in a distinct market where it holds a powerful, defensible, and profitable position. This enduring moat, built on local scale and customer loyalty, suggests a business model that is well-positioned to generate consistent returns over the long term, provided the Puerto Rican economy remains on a stable footing.
First BanCorp.'s recent financial statements reveal a company with strong core profitability and operational discipline. Revenue, primarily driven by net interest income, has shown steady growth, with a year-over-year increase of 7.85% in the most recent quarter. This growth is supported by a very strong efficiency ratio, which hovers around 50-52%. This indicates that the bank is highly effective at managing its non-interest expenses relative to the revenue it generates, a key strength in the regional banking sector. Profitability metrics are also a highlight, with Return on Equity (ROE) recently reported at 21.37%, significantly outperforming peers and demonstrating efficient use of shareholder capital to generate profits.
From a balance sheet perspective, the bank appears resilient and conservatively managed. The loans-to-deposits ratio was a healthy 75.9% in the latest quarter, suggesting ample liquidity and no over-reliance on volatile funding sources. The bank has also been actively managing its capital, with a debt-to-equity ratio of just 0.15 and consistent share buybacks. This conservative leverage and proactive capital return are positive signs for investors. Furthermore, the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of gross loans stands at a robust 1.9%, indicating the bank is well-reserved for potential loan defaults.
A key area of concern, however, lies in the bank's sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations. The balance sheet shows a significant negative -$392.46 million in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), which is largely composed of unrealized losses on its securities portfolio. This figure represents over 20% of the bank's tangible common equity, highlighting a vulnerability to rising interest rates that devalue its fixed-income investments. While this is a non-cash accounting adjustment, it directly reduces the bank's tangible book value and can constrain capital flexibility.
In conclusion, First BanCorp.'s financial foundation appears stable, anchored by excellent operational efficiency and strong profitability. Its conservative lending and funding practices provide a solid buffer against liquidity issues. The primary risk highlighted in its financial statements is the significant exposure to interest rate changes via its securities portfolio. For investors, this creates a trade-off: the bank's core operations are performing very well, but its balance sheet carries a notable sensitivity to the broader macroeconomic interest rate environment.
Over the past five fiscal years (FY2020–FY2024), First BanCorp. has executed a significant operational and financial turnaround, transitioning from a recovery story into a highly profitable regional bank. This analysis period captures the bank's emergence from the pandemic-induced challenges of 2020, which saw depressed earnings, to a period of sustained high returns. The bank's historical performance showcases impressive earnings growth, margin strength, and a strong commitment to returning capital to shareholders, often outperforming direct competitors like Popular, Inc. and U.S. regional peers on key profitability metrics.
The bank's growth has been most evident on its bottom line. From a low base of $0.46 in FY2020, diluted EPS grew to $1.82 by FY2024, representing an impressive compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 40%. This was fueled by a recovery in net interest income, which grew from $600.3 million to $807.5 million over the period, and a dramatic normalization of credit costs after a large $171 million provision in 2020. Profitability, measured by Return on Equity (ROE), has been a key strength, improving from a mere 4.54% in 2020 to a robust 18.87% in 2024, a level that is superior to most U.S. mainland regional banks.
First BanCorp's management has demonstrated a clear and effective capital allocation strategy. The bank has consistently generated strong operating cash flow, averaging approximately $382 million annually from 2020 to 2024. This cash flow has supported both aggressive dividend growth and substantial share repurchase programs. Dividends per share more than tripled from $0.20 in 2020 to $0.64 in 2024. Simultaneously, the bank reduced its diluted shares outstanding from 218 million to 165 million, providing a significant boost to EPS. This consistent return of capital underscores management's confidence in the bank's stability and earnings power.
In conclusion, First BanCorp's historical record over the last five years is one of significant value creation for shareholders. The bank has successfully navigated its operating environment to deliver high returns on equity, strong earnings growth, and substantial capital returns. While its balance sheet growth in core loans and deposits has been more modest, its ability to generate impressive profits from its asset base has been a defining feature. The past performance supports confidence in the management team's execution and the bank's resilience within its core market.
The future of regional banking, particularly for an entity as geographically concentrated as First BanCorp., will be shaped by a blend of macroeconomic trends and localized economic health. Over the next three to five years, the industry will continue its shift towards digital channels, though the importance of a physical branch network in a relationship-driven market like Puerto Rico will persist. A key industry change will be the intensified focus on diversifying revenue streams away from net interest income, which has proven volatile amid fluctuating interest rates. This will drive banks to build out capabilities in wealth management, treasury services, and other fee-generating businesses. For FBP, the primary catalyst for demand remains the economic trajectory of Puerto Rico, which is heavily influenced by the disbursement of an estimated ~$60 billion in federal funds for hurricane and pandemic recovery. This influx of capital is expected to fuel construction, infrastructure projects, and general commercial activity, directly benefiting FBP's loan portfolio. Competitive intensity in Puerto Rico is expected to remain rational within the existing oligopoly (FBP, Banco Popular, Oriental Bank), as high regulatory and cultural barriers to entry deter new players. Conversely, the competitive landscape in Florida, FBP's main diversification market, will remain fierce.
The U.S. regional banking market is projected to grow at a modest CAGR of 2-3%, a rate FBP's core operations will likely mirror. The key driver for any outperformance will be the bank's ability to capture a disproportionate share of the lending demand generated by Puerto Rico's recovery efforts. Digital banking adoption, while lagging the U.S. mainland, is growing steadily in the Caribbean and presents both an opportunity and a threat. Banks that successfully integrate digital convenience with their established branch network can deepen customer relationships and improve efficiency. For FBP, this means investing in mobile banking and online loan origination to defend its market share against both traditional rivals and emerging fintech solutions. The sustainability of the current economic upswing in Puerto Rico post-federal funding remains a critical variable, and any signs of a slowdown could quickly temper growth expectations for the entire Puerto Rican banking sector. Therefore, FBP's future is a tale of two markets: a stable, protected but slow-growing home base and a high-growth but hyper-competitive expansion market.
First BanCorp.'s largest and most important product line is its Commercial Lending in Puerto Rico. Currently, this portfolio of ~$10.5 billion is the engine of the bank, with usage intensity tied directly to the island's business investment cycle. Consumption is presently constrained by the pace of government fund disbursement and general economic uncertainty that can make businesses hesitant to take on new debt. Over the next 3-5 years, consumption of commercial and industrial (C&I) loans is expected to increase, particularly in sectors like construction, professional services, and logistics, all of which are direct beneficiaries of recovery funds. Conversely, new commercial real estate (CRE) development may see slower growth if interest rates remain elevated, tempering demand. The key catalyst for accelerated growth is a more efficient and transparent process for deploying federal funds, which would unlock a pipeline of private sector projects. The Puerto Rican commercial loan market is estimated to be around ~$30-35 billion, with FBP's growth likely to track the island's nominal GDP growth of 2-4% annually. A key consumption metric to watch is the utilization rate on commercial lines of credit, which could rise from the current 35-40% range as business activity picks up. In this market, FBP competes primarily with Banco Popular (BPOP). Customers often choose based on long-standing relationships and service quality. FBP tends to outperform in the small-to-medium enterprise space, whereas BPOP's larger balance sheet gives it an edge in financing major corporations. The number of banks in Puerto Rico has shrunk over the last two decades and is expected to remain stable due to the significant barriers to entry. A primary future risk is a stall in Puerto Rico's recovery (high probability), which would directly suppress loan demand. Another risk is a sharp deterioration in credit quality (medium probability) if a recessionary environment were to emerge after the stimulus effects wane.
Consumer Lending, representing about ~$5.4 billion of FBP's loan book, is the second pillar. Current consumption, which includes auto loans, personal loans, and credit cards, is limited by median household incomes in Puerto Rico and intense competition. Over the next 3-5 years, a modest increase in demand for auto and personal loans is expected, driven by a stable employment picture. However, this could be offset by persistent inflation that squeezes household budgets. The most significant shift will be in the channel, with a growing preference for digital loan applications. A potential catalyst for growth would be a decline in interest rates, which would make auto financing more affordable and attractive to consumers. The overall consumer credit market in Puerto Rico is mature, with expected annual growth in the low 1-3% range. Competition is fierce, not just from other banks but particularly from local credit unions ('cooperativas'), which are very strong and often win on price. FBP's advantage lies in its extensive branch network and its ability to cross-sell to its large existing depositor base. The number of players is stable and unlikely to change. The most significant risk for FBP in this segment is continued market share erosion to credit unions (high probability), which would pressure both loan volumes and margins. A secondary risk is a downturn in consumer financial health (medium probability), which would lead to higher delinquencies and charge-offs on unsecured loans.
FBP's expansion into Florida is its key strategic initiative for geographic diversification. Current consumption of its lending products in this market is relatively small but growing, focused on commercial and CRE loans. The primary constraint is FBP's limited brand recognition and scale in a market saturated with competitors. Over the next 3-5 years, this segment is planned to be the bank's fastest-growing area, with an expected increase in its Florida loan portfolio at a double-digit annualized rate. This growth is essential to reduce the bank's dependency on Puerto Rico. A catalyst for accelerating this growth would be the successful acquisition of a small, local Florida bank, providing an immediate boost in assets and customer relationships. The Florida banking market is enormous, with over ~$800 billion in deposits, making FBP a very small player. The bank's success will be measured by its ability to grow its loan book from ~$2.5 billion towards an estimated ~$4-5 billion over the next five years. However, competition is exceptionally intense, ranging from national giants like Bank of America to a host of established regional and community banks. Customers in this market have numerous options and FBP will likely struggle to compete on price, needing to focus on niche relationship lending. A major risk is simply the inability to gain meaningful traction (high probability), resulting in a costly and ultimately ineffective diversification strategy. Another concern is the risk of adverse selection (medium probability), where as a newer player, FBP might inadvertently lend to riskier clients that other banks have already passed on.
Finally, the growth of Fee-Based Services represents a significant opportunity but also a historical weakness for FBP. Current consumption is very low, with noninterest income making up only ~13% of total revenue, far below the 20-25% peer average. This income is mostly derived from basic deposit service charges and card interchange fees, with minimal contribution from wealth management or treasury services. Over the next 3-5 years, management aims to increase this contribution. The plan involves a modest expansion of treasury management services for commercial clients and potentially a small-scale push into wealth advisory. A potential catalyst would be a bolt-on acquisition of a small wealth management firm to jumpstart its capabilities. The goal would be to lift the fee income ratio towards 15-17% of total revenue, implying a growth rate in the 5-8% range annually, outpacing net interest income growth. Competition is well-entrenched, as BPOP has a much more developed fee income platform. The biggest risk is poor execution (high probability); building these services from a low base is difficult, costly, and may not yield significant results in the 3-5 year timeframe. This would leave FBP's earnings highly exposed to the fluctuations of interest rates.
Beyond these specific product areas, FBP's future earnings per share growth will be significantly influenced by its capital management strategy. With modest organic growth prospects, the bank's robust capital position allows for substantial capital returns to shareholders via dividends and, more impactfully, share buybacks. The consistent reduction of share count through repurchases provides a reliable, albeit inorganic, path to increasing EPS. Furthermore, the bank's ability to maintain a stable net interest margin in a volatile rate environment will be crucial. Any success in this area, combined with disciplined expense control, will protect the bottom line and fund the capital return program that forms a core part of its investor appeal. Lastly, continued investment in technology and digital platforms is not just an offensive move but a defensive necessity to protect its core deposit franchise from competitors and meet evolving customer expectations.
As of October 27, 2025, First BanCorp.'s stock price of $20.35 warrants a close look to determine its intrinsic value. A triangulated valuation approach suggests the stock is currently trading near the lower end of its fair value range. Based on a blended model, the stock appears fairly valued with a modest potential upside, with a calculated fair value range of $20.00–$22.50 against its current price.
A multiples-based approach highlights the stock's attractive pricing. FBP's trailing P/E ratio is 9.93x, which is below the regional banking industry average of around 11.7x, implying a potential value of nearly $24.00 based on its TTM EPS of $2.05. Similarly, its Price to Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) is 1.71x. While this is a premium to peers, it is strongly justified by the bank's exceptionally high Return on Equity (21.37%), which is well above the industry norm of 11-13%. A warranted P/TBV of 1.8x, reflecting this superior profitability, suggests a fair value of around $21.37.
A more conservative valuation using a simple dividend discount model yields a value of $19.08. This calculation assumes a 10% cost of equity and a 6% long-term dividend growth rate, which is a prudent estimate below its recent 12.5% dividend increase. However, this model is highly sensitive to input assumptions and is generally considered a secondary valuation method for banks compared to multiples-based analysis.
Combining these methods, with the most weight given to the P/E and P/TBV approaches that are standard for bank valuation, a fair value range of $20.00 to $22.50 is derived. With the current stock price at the bottom of this range, it suggests a modestly attractive entry point for investors seeking exposure to a high-quality regional bank.
Warren Buffett would view First BanCorp. as a highly profitable but ultimately flawed business for a long-term investment. He would be attracted to the strong Return on Equity of ~16% and the low price-to-earnings multiple of ~8.0x, which suggest a statistically cheap stock. However, the bank's overwhelming reliance on the historically volatile Puerto Rican economy represents a critical failure of his preference for predictable earnings and a durable competitive moat. For retail investors, the takeaway is that while the bank's operational performance is impressive, its geographic risk is too significant for a conservative, buy-and-hold forever strategy, leading Buffett to avoid the stock. He would only reconsider if the price fell dramatically below its tangible book value, providing an extraordinary margin of safety to compensate for the lack of predictability.
Charlie Munger would view First BanCorp. as a classic case of a high-quality business operating in a challenging environment. He would admire the company's powerful duopolistic position in Puerto Rico, which allows it to generate an impressive Return on Equity of ~16% and a strong Net Interest Margin of ~4.0%—metrics that indicate a potent earnings engine. The simple, understandable banking model and strong capitalization (Tier 1 Capital Ratio of ~14%) would also appeal to his 'avoiding stupidity' framework. However, Munger would be deeply concerned by the bank's overwhelming concentration in the Puerto Rican economy, a single point of failure that is susceptible to economic volatility and natural disasters. While the valuation at ~8.0x earnings seems fair, he would likely conclude that the geographic risk makes the situation 'too hard' to predict, favoring simplicity and durability over concentrated, high-return opportunities. For retail investors, Munger's takeaway is that even a profitable, well-run business can be a poor investment if its fate is tied to a fragile system. Forced to choose top banks, Munger might suggest First Financial Bankshares (FFIN) for its unparalleled 30-year track record of consistent earnings growth, Popular, Inc. (BPOP) for its dominant #1 market share in Puerto Rico, and Synovus (SNV) for its solid foothold in the economically robust U.S. Southeast. A significant, successful diversification of FBP's loan book into the U.S. mainland could change his assessment by mitigating the primary risk.
Bill Ackman would view First BanCorp. as a high-quality operator in a high-risk geography, ultimately making it a likely pass in 2025. He would be drawn to the company's simple business model and its strong pricing power within the Puerto Rican duopoly, which generates an impressive Return on Equity near 16% and a compelling earnings yield over 12%. However, this attractive financial profile is overshadowed by the immense and unpredictable macroeconomic risk tied to a single, volatile economy, which directly conflicts with his preference for durable, predictable enterprises. For retail investors, the takeaway is that while FBP executes well, Ackman would consider the geographic risk an unacceptable variable for a concentrated, long-term investment, requiring sustained economic stability on the island to reconsider.
First BanCorp. (FBP) carves out a unique position in the regional banking landscape primarily due to its heavy concentration in Puerto Rico. This geographic focus is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it provides FBP with deep market knowledge and a significant competitive moat against newcomers unfamiliar with the local regulatory and economic environment. This allows the bank to generate a Net Interest Margin (the difference between interest earned on loans and paid on deposits) that is often superior to U.S. mainland banks, which operate in more competitive markets. FBP's operational efficiency is also a key strength, consistently demonstrating a strong ability to manage costs relative to its income.
However, this reliance on Puerto Rico and, to a lesser extent, Florida, makes FBP's fortunes highly dependent on regional economic cycles. While mainland U.S. competitors may face downturns in specific states, their diversification across a broader economic base provides a layer of insulation that FBP lacks. Economic challenges, hurricane risks, and political developments in Puerto Rico can have an outsized impact on FBP's loan portfolio quality and growth prospects. Therefore, any analysis of FBP against its peers must weigh its impressive operational performance against this backdrop of concentrated geographic risk.
When compared to direct competitors in Puerto Rico like Popular, Inc., FBP often competes effectively on profitability and efficiency. Against mainland U.S. regional banks of a similar size, such as Synovus or Hancock Whitney, FBP frequently showcases better returns on assets and equity. The trade-off for investors is clear: FBP offers the potential for higher returns driven by its efficient operations in a less crowded market, but this comes with a risk profile that is less correlated with the broader U.S. economy and more tied to the specific, and sometimes volatile, conditions of the Caribbean market.
Ultimately, FBP represents a specialized play within the regional banking sector. It is not a broadly diversified financial institution but rather a focused operator that has mastered its core markets. Its strategy revolves around leveraging its local expertise to achieve high profitability. For an investor, this means the decision to invest in FBP is as much a bet on the continued economic stability and growth of Puerto Rico as it is on the bank's own management and operational capabilities. This contrasts sharply with peers whose success is tied to the more general economic health of the continental United States.
Popular, Inc. is First BanCorp.'s primary and largest competitor in Puerto Rico, making this the most direct comparison possible. Both banks have significant operations on the island and a presence in the U.S. mainland, primarily Florida and New York for Popular. Popular is the larger institution by a significant margin, with a market capitalization roughly double that of FBP and a larger balance sheet. This scale gives Popular certain advantages, but FBP often competes fiercely on profitability metrics and operational efficiency, showcasing a nimbler approach within their shared core market. The rivalry is intense, with both banks deeply entrenched in the local economy and community.
Winner: Popular, Inc. over First BanCorp.
Popular's brand in Puerto Rico is arguably stronger and more established, given it is the island's largest bank with over 125 years of history, giving it a powerful competitive advantage (#1 market share in deposits). FBP, while a major player (#2 market share), operates in Popular's shadow. Switching costs for retail and commercial customers are high for both due to integrated banking relationships, a factor that benefits the incumbent leader more. Popular's larger scale provides it with greater economies of scale in technology and marketing spend. Both banks benefit from significant regulatory barriers to entry in Puerto Rico, which shields them from large U.S. mainland competitors. However, Popular's larger network of branches and ATMs creates a stronger network effect. Overall, Popular, Inc. wins on Business & Moat due to its dominant market leadership and superior scale.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Popular, Inc.
Financially, FBP often demonstrates superior profitability. FBP's Net Interest Margin (NIM), a key measure of lending profitability, recently stood at ~4.0%, which is better than Popular's ~3.5%. FBP also tends to be more efficient, with an efficiency ratio (lower is better) around 55% compared to Popular's ~60%. This translates into stronger bottom-line returns, with FBP's Return on Equity (ROE) at ~16% versus ~14% for Popular. While Popular is larger and well-capitalized with a Tier 1 Capital ratio of ~15% (a measure of a bank's ability to absorb losses) versus FBP's ~14%, FBP's ability to generate more profit from its assets gives it the edge. In terms of financials, FBP is better due to its higher profitability and efficiency.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Popular, Inc.
Over the past five years, FBP has delivered stronger shareholder returns. FBP's 5-year Total Shareholder Return (TSR) has significantly outpaced Popular's, reflecting its strong earnings growth and improving investor sentiment. FBP's 5-year EPS CAGR has been in the high-teens, often exceeding Popular's growth rate. Margin trends have also favored FBP, with its NIM expanding more consistently. In terms of risk, both are subject to the same Puerto Rican economic volatility, but FBP's stock has shown slightly higher beta at times. However, FBP wins on growth and TSR, while risk profiles are similar. Overall, First BanCorp. is the winner on Past Performance due to its superior shareholder returns and earnings growth trajectory.
Winner: Tie
Both banks' future growth is inextricably linked to the economic trajectory of Puerto Rico. Key drivers include federal reconstruction funds flowing into the island, the growth of local industries, and rising interest rates which can expand their NIMs. Popular has a more diversified revenue stream with a larger U.S. mainland operation and a successful digital banking platform, giving it an edge in diversification. FBP, however, has more room to grow its market share in Florida and has shown a strong ability to manage credit quality. Analyst consensus for next-year EPS growth is similar for both, in the mid-single-digit range. Popular has an edge in revenue diversification, but FBP has stronger organic growth potential within its existing footprint. The outlook is evenly matched, with different paths to growth.
Winner: Popular, Inc. over First BanCorp.
From a valuation perspective, both stocks often trade at a discount to U.S. mainland peers due to the perceived risk of their primary market. Popular currently trades at a Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of approximately 1.0x, meaning it trades right at the stated value of its assets. FBP trades at a slight premium with a P/B of ~1.2x. On a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) basis, Popular is slightly cheaper at ~7.5x earnings compared to FBP's ~8.0x. FBP's higher valuation is justified by its superior profitability (higher ROE). However, Popular offers a similar dividend yield (~3.5%) at a lower book value multiple, suggesting a greater margin of safety for investors. Popular, Inc. is the better value today because it offers a comparable yield at a more attractive price relative to its book value.
Winner: Popular, Inc. over First BanCorp. The verdict favors Popular due to its commanding market leadership, superior scale, and more conservative valuation. FBP is a formidable competitor with key strengths in profitability, boasting a higher Net Interest Margin (~4.0% vs. ~3.5%) and Return on Equity (~16% vs. ~14%). However, its notable weakness is its perpetual number-two status in its home market and a slightly smaller capital buffer. The primary risk for both is their shared dependence on the Puerto Rican economy, but Popular's larger, more diversified operation and lower valuation provide a slightly better risk-adjusted proposition for investors. This decision is supported by Popular's stronger moat and greater margin of safety in its valuation.
Synovus Financial Corp. provides a classic comparison between a geographically concentrated, high-profitability bank (FBP) and a diversified U.S. mainland regional bank. Synovus operates across five southeastern states, including Florida, where it competes with FBP. With a market capitalization of around $5.5 billion, it is larger than FBP and offers a different risk-reward profile. The comparison highlights the trade-off between FBP's higher returns and Synovus's greater economic and geographic diversification, which typically appeals to more risk-averse investors.
Winner: Synovus Financial Corp. over First BanCorp.
Synovus possesses a stronger moat through geographic diversification. Its brand is well-established across the U.S. Southeast, a region with robust economic growth, serving a diverse base of commercial and retail clients across five states. FBP's brand is dominant in Puerto Rico but has limited recognition on the mainland. Switching costs are moderately high for both. Synovus's larger asset base (~$60B vs. FBP's ~$20B) provides greater economies of scale in technology and compliance. While both face significant regulatory barriers, Synovus's moat is wider due to its multi-state footprint, which reduces dependence on any single economy. FBP's moat is deep but narrow. Overall, Synovus Financial Corp. wins on Business & Moat because its diversification provides a more durable competitive advantage.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Synovus Financial Corp.
FBP is the clear winner on financial performance, driven by its favorable market structure. FBP's Net Interest Margin of ~4.0% is significantly higher than Synovus's ~3.3%, indicating superior lending profitability. This flows directly to the bottom line, where FBP's Return on Equity of ~16% soundly beats Synovus's ~12%. FBP is also more efficient, with an efficiency ratio around 55% versus ~58% for Synovus. Both banks are well-capitalized, but FBP's Tier 1 Capital ratio of ~14% is stronger than Synovus's ~12%. Although Synovus has higher revenue growth potential from its economically vibrant markets, FBP is better at converting its assets into profits. FBP is the overall Financials winner due to its superior margins, returns, and capitalization.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Synovus Financial Corp.
Historically, FBP has delivered more impressive growth and returns. Over the last five years, FBP's EPS has grown at a much faster pace, often in the double-digits, compared to the mid-single-digit growth for Synovus. This has translated into a superior 5-year Total Shareholder Return for FBP. While Synovus has shown steady, reliable performance, FBP's recovery and growth story in Puerto Rico has generated more alpha. In terms of risk, Synovus is less volatile due to its diversified loan book, giving it the edge on risk management. However, FBP is the winner on growth and TSR. Overall, First BanCorp. wins on Past Performance due to its exceptional growth and shareholder returns, even with a higher risk profile.
Winner: Synovus Financial Corp. over First BanCorp. The future growth outlook favors Synovus. Its operations are centered in high-growth southeastern markets like Georgia, Florida, and Tennessee, which benefit from strong population and business inflows. This provides a powerful tailwind for loan and deposit growth that FBP's core Puerto Rican market cannot match. FBP's growth is more tied to event-driven recovery and federal funding. Analyst consensus projects higher long-term earnings growth for Synovus. While FBP has cost-efficiency programs, Synovus has a much larger addressable market (TAM) for organic expansion. Synovus has the edge on market demand and revenue opportunities. Synovus Financial Corp. is the winner on growth outlook due to its presence in more dynamic and faster-growing economies.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Synovus Financial Corp.
FBP offers a more compelling valuation. It trades at a P/E ratio of ~8.0x and a P/B ratio of ~1.2x. In contrast, Synovus trades at a higher P/E of ~9.5x and a similar P/B of ~1.1x. The key difference is what you get for that price: FBP delivers a much higher ROE (~16% vs. ~12%). FBP also offers a slightly higher dividend yield of ~4.0% compared to Synovus's ~3.8%. The quality vs. price assessment favors FBP; investors are paying less for a bank that is significantly more profitable. First BanCorp. is the better value today because its valuation multiples do not fully reflect its superior profitability metrics.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Synovus Financial Corp. The verdict goes to FBP based on its superior profitability, stronger historical performance, and more attractive valuation. FBP's key strengths are its best-in-class Net Interest Margin (~4.0% vs. ~3.3%) and Return on Equity (~16% vs. ~12%), which are hard for diversified mainland banks to match. Its notable weakness and primary risk is its heavy concentration in the Puerto Rican economy, which makes it more volatile than Synovus. However, investors are compensated for this risk through a lower P/E ratio and higher returns. The decision is justified because FBP offers a more potent combination of growth and value, provided the investor can tolerate the geographic concentration risk.
Hancock Whitney Corporation operates across the Gulf South region, including Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida, making it a well-diversified regional bank. Its market capitalization is around $3.8 billion, placing it in the same peer group as First BanCorp. The comparison pits FBP's concentrated, high-margin model against HWC's broader, more cyclical model tied to the energy and coastal economies of the Gulf. HWC offers stability through diversification, while FBP offers higher but more concentrated profitability.
Winner: Hancock Whitney Corporation over First BanCorp.
Hancock Whitney's business moat is stronger due to its geographic spread and entrenched position in diverse local economies. Its brand is a household name in coastal markets from Texas to Florida, with a history dating back to 1899. FBP's brand is strong only in Puerto Rico. HWC's presence in five states diversifies its risk, unlike FBP's concentration. Switching costs are comparable for both. HWC's larger asset base (~$35B vs. FBP's ~$20B) allows for better economies of scale. The key differentiator is diversification; HWC is not reliant on a single, non-U.S. economy. Overall, Hancock Whitney Corporation wins on Business & Moat due to its superior geographic and economic diversification.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Hancock Whitney Corporation.
FBP is financially more potent. FBP's Net Interest Margin of ~4.0% easily surpasses HWC's ~3.4%. This profitability advantage is significant and drives superior returns, with FBP posting a Return on Equity of ~16% compared to HWC's ~13%. FBP is also more streamlined, with an efficiency ratio of ~55% versus HWC's ~59%. Both banks are well-capitalized, but FBP's Tier 1 Capital ratio of ~14% offers a thicker cushion than HWC's ~12.5%. HWC's loan growth is steadier, but FBP is better at generating profit from its existing book of business. FBP is the clear Financials winner due to its dominant margins and returns.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Hancock Whitney Corporation.
Historically, FBP has generated superior shareholder returns. Over the past five years, FBP's stock has significantly outperformed HWC, driven by a powerful earnings recovery and multiple expansion. FBP's 5-year EPS CAGR has consistently been in the double-digits, far exceeding the mid-single-digit growth from HWC. While HWC's performance is more stable, it has lacked the dynamic growth FBP has shown. On risk, HWC's stock is less volatile due to its diversified earnings base, giving it an edge there. However, FBP wins on the key metrics of growth and TSR. Overall, First BanCorp. wins on Past Performance because of its explosive earnings growth and market outperformance.
Winner: Hancock Whitney Corporation over First BanCorp. Hancock Whitney has a more favorable path to future growth. Its exposure to high-growth markets in Texas and Florida, coupled with the broader economic recovery in the Gulf Coast, provides strong organic growth tailwinds. HWC is well-positioned to capitalize on commercial and industrial lending as these economies expand. FBP's growth is more limited by the mature Puerto Rican market and its reliance on event-driven catalysts. Consensus estimates typically forecast more stable and predictable long-term loan growth for HWC. HWC has the edge on market demand and expansion opportunities. Hancock Whitney Corporation is the winner for Growth Outlook due to its more dynamic and diversified end markets.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Hancock Whitney Corporation.
FBP is more attractively valued on a risk-adjusted basis. FBP trades at a P/E of ~8.0x, which is slightly cheaper than HWC's ~8.5x. However, FBP's P/B ratio of ~1.2x is higher than HWC's 1.0x. The critical difference is that FBP's 1.2x P/B is supported by a ~16% ROE, while HWC's 1.0x P/B is supported by a lower ~13% ROE. FBP offers a higher dividend yield of ~4.0% versus ~3.5% for HWC. Investors in FBP are paying a slight premium on book value but getting significantly higher profitability and a better yield. First BanCorp. is the better value today because its valuation is more attractive relative to its superior earnings power.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Hancock Whitney Corporation. The verdict favors FBP due to its superior financial engine and more compelling valuation. FBP’s key strengths are its exceptional Net Interest Margin (~4.0% vs. HWC’s ~3.4%) and higher return on equity (~16% vs. ~13%), which demonstrate a more efficient and profitable business model. Its primary weakness and risk remain its geographic concentration in Puerto Rico, making it more vulnerable to localized downturns than the diversified HWC. Despite this, FBP's stronger profitability and higher dividend yield offer investors better compensation for the risks undertaken. This verdict is supported by FBP's demonstrated ability to generate higher returns for shareholders at a reasonable valuation.
OFG Bancorp is the third-largest bank in Puerto Rico, making it another direct and important competitor to First BanCorp. Smaller than both FBP and Popular, OFG has carved out a niche as an agile and often more digitally-focused institution. The comparison between FBP and OFG is a study in scale and strategy within the same constrained market. FBP is the larger, more established player, while OFG often acts as a nimbler challenger, sometimes achieving even higher levels of profitability on a smaller asset base.
Winner: First BanCorp. over OFG Bancorp.
FBP has a stronger business and moat due to its superior scale and market position. FBP is the #2 bank in Puerto Rico by deposits and assets, while OFG is #3. This provides FBP with a stronger brand presence and a larger branch network, creating a more significant barrier to share loss. Switching costs are high for both, but FBP's larger commercial banking relationships are stickier. FBP's scale (~$20B in assets vs. OFG's ~$10B) provides greater operating leverage and capacity for larger loans. Both benefit from the island's regulatory barriers. FBP's network effect is stronger due to its larger customer base. Overall, First BanCorp. wins on Business & Moat because its second-place market standing creates a more durable competitive position than OFG's third-place.
Winner: OFG Bancorp over First BanCorp.
Despite its smaller size, OFG often edges out FBP on key financial metrics. OFG's Net Interest Margin is exceptionally high, recently reaching ~4.5%, which is better than FBP's already strong ~4.0%. This margin superiority drives phenomenal returns, with OFG's Return on Equity often exceeding ~17%, slightly better than FBP's ~16%. OFG also runs a very lean operation, with an efficiency ratio comparable to FBP's at ~56%. While both are well-capitalized (Tier 1 ratios of ~13-14%), OFG's ability to generate industry-leading margins and returns from a smaller base is remarkable. OFG is the overall Financials winner due to its superior NIM and ROE.
Winner: Tie
Both FBP and OFG have delivered spectacular performance over the past five years as Puerto Rico's economy recovered. Both have seen their EPS grow at double-digit CAGRs, and both have produced outstanding Total Shareholder Returns that have far outpaced the broader banking index. FBP has the edge in absolute dollar earnings growth due to its size, but OFG has often shown faster percentage growth. Margin trends have been positive for both. Risk profiles are nearly identical, as both are pure-play bets on the Puerto Rican economy. It is difficult to declare a clear winner here, as both have been exceptional performers. This category is a tie, reflecting their shared success in a recovering market.
Winner: Tie Future growth for both banks is almost entirely dependent on the same set of macro drivers: the pace of economic growth in Puerto Rico, the flow of federal aid, and interest rate policy. Neither has a significant growth driver that is independent of the other. FBP has a larger base to grow from and more capacity for large corporate loans. OFG, however, is smaller and more agile, potentially able to grow its market share faster from a lower base, and has a strong wealth management arm. Analyst expectations for both are closely aligned, with modest growth expected going forward. The growth outlook is a tie as their fates are linked to the same external factors.
Winner: OFG Bancorp over First BanCorp.
OFG Bancorp typically trades at a more attractive valuation than FBP. OFG's P/E ratio is often around ~7.0x, which is lower than FBP's ~8.0x. Its P/B ratio of ~1.1x is also slightly lower than FBP's ~1.2x. This is noteworthy because OFG generates a higher ROE (~17% vs. ~16%). In essence, investors are paying less for a bank that is arguably more profitable. FBP's larger size and higher dividend yield (~4.0% vs. OFG's ~3.0%) command a slight premium, but on pure earnings and book value multiples, OFG presents a better deal. OFG Bancorp is the better value today because it offers superior profitability at a lower valuation.
Winner: OFG Bancorp over First BanCorp. The verdict narrowly goes to OFG Bancorp, primarily due to its superior profitability metrics and more compelling valuation. OFG’s key strength is its best-in-class Net Interest Margin of ~4.5% and a resulting ROE of over 17%, which are among the highest in the entire U.S. banking sector. Its main weakness is its smaller scale and #3 market position, which makes it less of a market anchor than FBP. The primary risk for both is identical—geographic concentration in Puerto Rico. However, OFG's ability to generate higher returns at a cheaper valuation gives it a slight edge for investors seeking maximum efficiency and value. This verdict is supported by OFG's superior financial metrics offered at a discounted price.
Cadence Bank is a regional bank with a significant presence across the Southeast and Texas, resulting from the merger of Cadence Bancorporation and BancorpSouth Bank. With a market capitalization of around $4.6 billion, it is larger and more geographically diverse than First BanCorp. The comparison illustrates the difference between FBP's focused, high-margin business and Cadence's strategy of building a large, diversified franchise through acquisition. Cadence offers scale and broad market exposure, while FBP offers higher organic profitability.
Winner: Cadence Bank over First BanCorp.
Cadence Bank's moat is built on its broad geographic footprint and scale. Operating in nine states, including high-growth markets like Texas and Florida, provides significant economic diversification that insulates it from regional downturns—a luxury FBP does not have. Its larger asset base of ~$50B provides greater economies of scale in technology, marketing, and regulatory compliance. The merger of two sizable banks created a powerful franchise with deep client relationships across a wide territory. FBP's moat is deep in Puerto Rico but geographically very narrow. Overall, Cadence Bank wins on Business & Moat due to its superior scale and diversification.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Cadence Bank.
FBP is a far more profitable and efficient bank. FBP’s Net Interest Margin of ~4.0% is substantially higher than Cadence’s ~3.2%. This translates directly into superior returns, with FBP’s Return on Equity at ~16% dwarfing Cadence's ~10%. Furthermore, FBP is a much leaner operator, with an efficiency ratio of ~55% compared to Cadence's less efficient ~62%, which is still impacted by merger integration costs. FBP also has a stronger capital position, with a Tier 1 Capital ratio of ~14% versus ~11.5% for Cadence. FBP is the decisive Financials winner across every major profitability, efficiency, and capitalization metric.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Cadence Bank.
Over the past five years, FBP has delivered far superior results. FBP's stock has dramatically outperformed Cadence's, driven by strong, organic earnings growth. FBP's 5-year EPS CAGR has been in the high-teens, while Cadence's growth has been lumpier and more reliant on acquisitions, with weaker underlying performance. FBP's margins have been consistently strong, while Cadence's have been more volatile. Cadence has the edge on risk due to its diversification, but its financial performance has been lackluster. FBP wins easily on growth and TSR. Overall, First BanCorp. wins on Past Performance due to its consistent organic growth and much stronger shareholder returns.
Winner: Cadence Bank over First BanCorp. The future growth story for Cadence appears more promising due to its strategic positioning. Post-merger, Cadence has a powerful platform in some of the nation's fastest-growing markets. The bank has significant opportunities to realize cost savings (synergies) from the merger and cross-sell products to a wider customer base. Its exposure to the dynamic Texas and Southeast economies provides a stronger tailwind for loan growth than FBP's Puerto Rican market. Analysts expect Cadence's earnings to accelerate as merger integration is completed. Cadence Bank is the winner for Growth Outlook because it has more levers to pull for future growth, including merger synergies and superior market demographics.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Cadence Bank.
FBP is a much better value proposition. FBP trades at a P/E of ~8.0x, which is cheaper than Cadence's ~9.0x. More importantly, FBP's P/B ratio is ~1.2x while Cadence's is only ~0.9x. While Cadence looks cheaper on book value, its low ~10% ROE does not even cover its cost of equity, suggesting the bank is destroying value. FBP's ~16% ROE on a 1.2x P/B is a sign of a healthy, value-creating institution. FBP's dividend yield (~4.0%) is comparable to Cadence's (~4.2%), but FBP's dividend is much safer given its higher profitability. First BanCorp. is the better value because investors are buying a high-returning, efficient bank at a reasonable price, whereas Cadence is a low-returning bank trading at a deserved discount.
Winner: First BanCorp. over Cadence Bank. The verdict is a clear win for First BanCorp. based on its vastly superior financial performance and quality. FBP’s key strengths are its best-in-class profitability (~16% ROE vs. ~10%) and efficiency (~55% ratio vs. ~62%), which demonstrate operational excellence. Its main weakness is its geographic concentration. Cadence's strength is its diversified footprint, but its notable weaknesses are its poor profitability, inefficiency, and reliance on an M&A-driven strategy that has yet to deliver strong shareholder value. The primary risk for Cadence is failing to successfully integrate its mergers and improve its core profitability. This verdict is justified because FBP is a fundamentally higher-quality and better-run bank, making it a superior investment despite its geographic risks.
Based on industry classification and performance score:
First BanCorp. operates with a powerful competitive moat rooted in its dominant market position in the oligopolistic Puerto Rican banking sector. Its business model thrives on a large, stable, and low-cost deposit base gathered through a significant branch network, which funds its lending operations in commercial, consumer, and mortgage segments. While this geographic concentration makes it highly dependent on Puerto Rico's economy, its entrenched relationships and brand recognition create substantial barriers to entry. The bank's expansion into Florida provides some diversification, but it lacks the same competitive advantages there. The investor takeaway is positive, as FBP's core franchise in Puerto Rico provides a durable, profitable foundation that is difficult for competitors to replicate.
First BanCorp's revenue is heavily reliant on net interest income, with a relatively small and undiversified stream of fee-based income, creating vulnerability to interest rate fluctuations.
A notable weakness in FBP's business model is its limited revenue diversification. For the first quarter of 2024, noninterest income was approximately $29 million, representing only about 13% of total revenues ($220 million in net interest income + $29 million in noninterest income). This is well below the typical regional bank average of 20-25%. The fee income is primarily driven by service charges on deposit accounts and interchange fees, with less contribution from more stable sources like wealth management or trust services. This high dependence on net interest income makes the bank's earnings more sensitive to changes in interest rates and loan demand. While its strong deposit franchise helps protect its net interest margin, the lack of a substantial fee income stream is a structural vulnerability compared to more diversified peers.
The bank's deposit base is well-diversified across retail, commercial, and public-sector clients, with a low reliance on volatile brokered deposits.
First BanCorp. demonstrates a healthy and diversified deposit mix, which reduces funding concentration risk. The majority of its deposits come from a granular base of retail and commercial customers, reflecting its community banking focus. As of the end of 2023, brokered deposits accounted for just 6% of total deposits, which is a low and prudent level. A low reliance on brokered deposits is a sign of strength, as it indicates the bank is not dependent on expensive, wholesale funding sources that can be unreliable during times of market stress. The bank's deposits are sourced from a mix of consumer accounts, small-to-medium sized businesses, and public funds from Puerto Rican municipalities, creating a balanced and stable funding profile. This diversification is a key element of its conservative risk management and contributes to its overall business resilience.
The bank's primary niche is its dominant market position and specialized expertise in the Puerto Rican market, which functions as a powerful competitive advantage.
While First BanCorp. may not have a niche in a specific lending category like SBA or agriculture on a national scale, its entire business model is built around a powerful geographic niche: Puerto Rico. The bank possesses deep institutional knowledge of the local economy, regulatory environment, and key industries. Its loan portfolio is tailored to the needs of this market, with significant concentrations in commercial and consumer lending to Puerto Rican businesses and households. This specialization allows FBP to underwrite risk more effectively than an outside competitor could. Its leadership position in the market provides it with pricing power and a steady flow of business. This geographic focus, combined with its market share, acts as a significant competitive differentiator and a durable moat that protects its franchise.
The bank benefits from a very stable and low-cost deposit base, with a high percentage of noninterest-bearing accounts, which significantly lowers its funding costs compared to peers.
A key strength for First BanCorp. is the quality and stability of its deposit franchise. As of Q1 2024, noninterest-bearing deposits constituted approximately 26% of total deposits. This is a solid figure and provides a substantial base of free funding. The bank's total cost of deposits was 1.89% in the same period, which remains competitive and is a testament to its loyal customer base in Puerto Rico, where banking relationships are often sticky. Furthermore, uninsured deposits were estimated to be around 33% of total deposits, a manageable level that suggests a well-diversified base of retail and small business customers rather than a reliance on a few large, 'hot money' accounts. This stable, low-cost funding is a significant competitive advantage that supports a healthy net interest margin through various interest rate cycles.
First BanCorp. leverages its dense and strategically located branch network in Puerto Rico to build a dominant local scale, enabling efficient deposit gathering and strong community relationships.
First BanCorp's primary competitive advantage is its significant physical presence in its core market of Puerto Rico. As of early 2024, the bank operated 48 branches in Puerto Rico, complemented by a substantial network of ATMs. This density provides a powerful moat, as it embeds the bank in local communities and supports its relationship-based banking model. The bank's deposits per branch are robust, reflecting efficient asset gathering from its established footprint. While many U.S. banks are aggressively rationalizing their branch networks, FBP's network remains a critical asset in a market where in-person banking is still highly valued. This deep local entrenchment makes it difficult for outside competitors, or even smaller local players, to challenge its market share in deposit gathering and loan origination.
First BanCorp. shows a solid financial position, marked by strong profitability and excellent cost control. The bank's most recent results highlight a robust return on equity of 21.37% and an impressive efficiency ratio of 50.2%, both of which are better than industry averages. However, the balance sheet shows a significant negative impact from accumulated other comprehensive income (-$392.46 million), which reduces tangible book value and signals sensitivity to interest rate changes. Overall, the financial statements present a mixed but leaning positive picture for investors, balancing strong operational performance against potential interest rate risks.
The bank maintains a strong liquidity position with a conservative loan-to-deposit ratio and a healthy tangible equity level, providing a solid buffer against financial stress.
First BanCorp. demonstrates a healthy capital and liquidity position. Its tangible common equity to total assets ratio was 9.7% ($1.88 billion / $19.32 billion) in the last quarter, which is a solid buffer and generally considered well-capitalized. While specific regulatory capital ratios like CET1 are not provided, this tangible equity level provides a good measure of loss-absorbing capacity.
The bank's liquidity is a key strength. The loans-to-deposits ratio stood at 75.9% ($12.8 billion in net loans to $16.86 billion in deposits). This is well BELOW the typical industry benchmark of 80-90%, indicating that the bank is not overly aggressive in its lending and has substantial deposit funding to cover its loan book and support future growth. This conservative stance provides a strong defense against funding pressures.
The bank appears well-prepared for potential credit losses with a reserve level that is stronger than typical industry standards.
First BanCorp. shows disciplined credit management through its robust loss reserves. In the latest quarter, the allowance for credit losses was $248.58 million against a gross loan portfolio of $13.05 billion. This results in an allowance-to-gross loans ratio of 1.9%. This coverage is STRONG and ABOVE the typical regional bank average, which often falls in the 1.2% to 1.5% range, suggesting a conservative and prudent approach to credit risk.
The provision for credit losses was $17.59 million in the most recent quarter and $20.59 million in the prior quarter. These consistent provisions indicate that management is actively setting aside funds to cover anticipated loan issues, rather than ignoring potential risks. While data on nonperforming loans and net charge-offs is not available to complete the picture, the high level of reserves provides a significant buffer to absorb potential future credit deterioration, protecting the bank's earnings and book value.
The bank's tangible equity is significantly reduced by unrealized losses on its securities portfolio, indicating high sensitivity to interest rate movements.
First BanCorp.'s balance sheet shows a notable vulnerability to interest rate changes. The accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) was negative -$392.46 million in the most recent quarter. When compared to the tangible common equity of 1.88 billion, this negative AOCI represents about 20.9% of the bank's tangible equity. This is a significant figure and suggests that rising interest rates have materially devalued the bank's portfolio of investment securities.
While these are unrealized, paper losses, they directly reduce the bank's tangible book value, a key metric for bank valuation and capital adequacy. A large negative AOCI can limit a bank's flexibility in managing its capital and selling securities without realizing substantial losses. Although data on the specific duration of the securities portfolio is not provided, this large negative balance strongly implies a meaningful exposure to longer-duration, fixed-rate assets. This risk factor is a clear weakness in an otherwise solid financial profile.
The bank is successfully growing its core earnings power, as shown by consistent year-over-year growth in its net interest income.
First BanCorp.'s ability to generate core earnings from its lending and investing activities appears solid. Net interest income (NII), the difference between interest earned on assets and interest paid on liabilities, grew by a healthy 7.85% year-over-year in the most recent quarter to $217.92 million. This followed 8.13% growth in the prior quarter, indicating a positive and sustained trend. This growth is crucial as NII is the primary source of revenue for most regional banks.
While a precise Net Interest Margin (NIM) percentage is not provided, the underlying components point to a healthy spread. Total interest income in Q3 2025 was $282.74 million while total interest expense was $64.83 million. This demonstrates strong earnings power from its asset base. The consistent growth in NII suggests the bank is effectively managing its asset yields and funding costs in the current interest rate environment, which is a positive sign for earnings stability.
The bank operates with excellent efficiency, consistently keeping costs low relative to revenue, which is a significant competitive advantage.
First BanCorp. demonstrates exceptional cost control, a key driver of its profitability. The bank's efficiency ratio in the last two quarters was 50.2% and 50.0%, respectively. This is a STRONG performance, as it is significantly BELOW the industry benchmark where ratios under 60% are considered efficient and those approaching 50% are viewed as excellent. This means the bank spends only about 50 cents in non-interest expenses to generate each dollar of revenue.
This lean cost structure allows more revenue to flow down to pre-tax profit, giving the bank a distinct advantage over less efficient peers. Non-interest expenses have remained stable, totaling $124.89 million in the most recent quarter. Salaries and benefits make up the largest component at 47.9% ($59.76 million), which is typical for a service-oriented business like banking. The bank's ability to maintain such a low efficiency ratio is a major strength and a sign of disciplined operational management.
First BanCorp. has demonstrated a remarkable turnaround and strong performance over the last five years. The bank's earnings per share (EPS) surged from $0.46 in 2020 to $1.82 in 2024, driven by improving profitability and aggressive share buybacks that reduced share count by nearly 25%. This performance, coupled with a Return on Equity (ROE) that has consistently exceeded 18% since 2022, has allowed it to deliver superior shareholder returns compared to many mainland U.S. and Puerto Rican peers. While its growth in loans and deposits has been steady rather than spectacular, its execution on profitability and capital returns has been excellent. The investor takeaway is positive, reflecting a well-managed bank that has capitalized on its market recovery, though investors should remain mindful of its concentration in the Puerto Rican economy.
The bank has achieved steady and prudent growth in its core loans and deposits, maintaining a stable loan-to-deposit ratio that reflects disciplined balance sheet management.
First BanCorp's balance sheet has expanded at a moderate but consistent pace. Gross loans grew from $11.8 billion in FY2020 to $12.9 billion in FY2024, while total deposits increased from $15.3 billion to $16.9 billion over the same period. This represents slow but stable growth, indicating the bank is not taking on excessive risk to expand its balance sheet. The growth reflects a mature market position in Puerto Rico.
A key indicator of prudent management is the loan-to-deposit ratio, which measures how much of the bank's core deposit funding is being lent out. FBP's ratio has been remarkably stable, moving from 77.3% in FY2020 to 76.3% in FY2024. This consistency shows that the bank is not stretching to make loans and is maintaining a healthy liquidity profile, which is a positive sign for conservative investors.
The bank has successfully maintained a strong net interest margin (NIM) and improved its operational efficiency over the past five years, underpinning its robust profitability.
A bank's core profitability comes from its net interest margin (NIM)—the difference between the interest it earns on loans and pays on deposits. While the specific NIM is not provided in the data, the growth in net interest income from $600.3 million in FY2020 to $807.5 million in FY2024 in a changing rate environment suggests strong margin management. Competitor analysis confirms FBP's NIM is around a very healthy 4.0%, superior to most peers.
Equally important is a bank's cost control, measured by the efficiency ratio (where lower is better). FBP has shown a positive trend here, with the ratio improving from 55.7% in FY2020 to 51.7% in FY2024. This demonstrates management's ability to control non-interest expenses while growing revenue, which is a critical skill for sustaining long-term profitability and shareholder returns.
The company has delivered an exceptional track record of earnings per share (EPS) growth, driven by a combination of net income recovery and aggressive share repurchases.
First BanCorp's EPS growth has been the cornerstone of its strong stock performance. Diluted EPS skyrocketed from $0.46 in FY2020 to $1.82 in FY2024, a compound annual growth rate of 41%. While this impressive figure is boosted by the low starting point in 2020, the year-over-year progression has been consistently positive. This growth has outpaced many of its peers, including larger rival Popular, Inc.
This earnings power is also reflected in the bank's return on equity (ROE), a key measure of profitability. After a low 4.54% ROE in 2020, the bank's ROE has consistently been excellent, hitting 17.8% in FY2022, 21.5% in FY2023, and 18.9% in FY2024. An average ROE of over 19% for the past three years indicates a highly profitable and well-run institution.
Credit quality has significantly improved and stabilized since 2020, with provisions for loan losses returning to normal levels after a pandemic-related spike, reflecting disciplined risk management.
A bank's health is heavily dependent on its ability to manage credit risk, and FBP's recent history is positive. The bank recorded a large provision for loan losses of $171 million in FY2020, a proactive measure taken in response to the economic uncertainty of the pandemic. In a strong sign of recovery, this was followed by a reversal, or benefit, of -$65.7 million in FY2021 as economic conditions improved. Since then, provisions have normalized, settling around $60 million in both FY2023 and FY2024.
This trend demonstrates that the bank has successfully navigated a challenging credit cycle. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans has declined from a very high 3.26% in FY2020 to a more normal, yet still robust, 1.89% in FY2024. This indicates a healthier loan portfolio and a return to a stable credit environment, which is fundamental to consistent earnings.
First BanCorp. has an excellent record of returning capital to shareholders, demonstrated by strong dividend growth and a significant reduction in share count through buybacks.
The bank's commitment to shareholder returns is a clear strength in its historical performance. Dividends per share have increased every year, rising from $0.20 in FY2020 to $0.64 in FY2024, which translates to a compound annual growth rate of 33.7%. This rapid growth was supported by improving earnings, while the dividend payout ratio remained conservative at around 35% in FY2024, suggesting sustainability and room for future growth.
Beyond dividends, FBP has been very active in repurchasing its own stock. Over the last five years, diluted shares outstanding have fallen from 218 million to 165 million, a reduction of nearly 25%. The company spent $102.4 million on buybacks in FY2024 and an even larger $203.2 million in FY2023. This aggressive buyback activity has been a powerful driver of its per-share earnings growth and signals management's belief that the stock is a good investment.
First BanCorp.'s future growth outlook is mixed, heavily anchored to the modest economic recovery in Puerto Rico. The bank's primary tailwind is the continued deployment of federal reconstruction funds, which should support stable, low-single-digit loan growth. However, significant headwinds include its high dependency on the slow-growing Puerto Rican economy and a historically low contribution from fee-based income. While its capital return program is a clear positive for shareholders, the lack of strong organic growth drivers and intense competition in its secondary Florida market limit its upside potential. The investor takeaway is one of stability over dynamic growth, suitable for those seeking consistent capital returns rather than rapid expansion.
The bank projects modest low-to-mid single-digit loan growth, a realistic but uninspiring outlook that reflects the slow-growth nature of its primary Puerto Rican market.
Management's guidance for low-to-mid single-digit loan growth for the upcoming fiscal year is a sober reflection of its operating environment. Growth is expected to be steady, supported by commercial lending tied to federal recovery funds in Puerto Rico and continued organic expansion in Florida. However, this level of growth is in line with or slightly below that of the broader regional banking industry and does not suggest any unique catalyst for acceleration. While the outlook is stable and likely achievable, it does not represent a strong growth story. A 'Pass' in this category would require a clearer path to above-average growth, which FBP currently lacks.
FBP maintains a very strong capital position and has a clear and consistent strategy of returning excess capital to shareholders through significant share buybacks, which is a primary driver of EPS growth.
With a Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of 14.86%, First BanCorp. is exceptionally well-capitalized, sitting well above both regulatory requirements and its internal targets. Management has demonstrated a strong commitment to returning this excess capital to shareholders. The company recently announced a new $400 million share repurchase authorization, which is significant relative to its market capitalization. Given the bank's modest organic growth profile, this disciplined capital return program is a crucial and reliable component of its value proposition for investors and a key driver of growth in earnings per share and tangible book value per share.
The bank's strategy for its branch network and digital channels appears more focused on maintenance than aggressive optimization, lacking clear public targets for cost savings or digital growth.
First BanCorp. operates in a market where physical branches remain highly relevant, and its current network is a competitive advantage. However, the bank has not articulated a clear, forward-looking strategy with specific targets for optimization. There are no significant announced plans for branch closures that would lead to material cost savings, nor are there ambitious, stated goals for growing digital active users. While FBP is undoubtedly investing in its digital capabilities to keep pace, the approach seems reactive rather than a proactive strategy to drive future efficiency and capture a new generation of customers. Without clear metrics and targets, it is difficult to see this as a key driver of future growth.
Management's guidance suggests a stabilization of the Net Interest Margin (NIM), which is a sign of strength and effective balance sheet management in a challenging interest rate environment.
After a period of compression due to rapidly rising deposit costs, First BanCorp.'s Net Interest Margin (NIM) appears to be stabilizing around the 3.15% level reported in Q1 2024. Management's commentary indicates that the pressure on funding costs is abating, while yields on its loan and securities portfolios are holding firm. The bank's liability-sensitive balance sheet is also well-positioned to benefit from eventual cuts in interest rates. In the current macroeconomic climate, preventing further significant NIM erosion and achieving stability is a mark of strong financial management and protects the bank's core earnings power.
While management acknowledges the need to grow its low level of fee income, the absence of a concrete strategy and specific public targets makes this more of an aspiration than a credible future growth pillar.
First BanCorp.'s reliance on net interest income is a strategic weakness, with fee-based income contributing only around 13% of total revenue. Although the bank has expressed a desire to grow its noninterest income, it has not provided investors with specific, quantifiable targets for growth in areas like wealth management assets or treasury services revenue. The current fee structure is dominated by basic account services and interchange fees, which offer limited growth potential. Without a detailed plan for investment, talent acquisition, or new product rollouts, the prospect of significantly diversifying the bank's revenue stream in the next 3-5 years remains low.
As of October 27, 2025, First BanCorp. (FBP) appears modestly undervalued, with a closing price of $20.35. The bank's strong profitability metrics, including a trailing P/E ratio of 9.93x and a high Return on Equity of 21.37%, suggest a healthy and efficient operation. Compared to the regional banking sector, FBP's valuation is attractive, with a P/E ratio below the industry average and a competitive dividend yield. The stock is currently trading in the upper third of its 52-week range, indicating positive market sentiment. For investors, this presents a neutral to positive takeaway: the stock is not deeply discounted, but it is a high-performing bank trading at a reasonable price.
The Price to Tangible Book Value (P/TBV) of 1.71x is well-supported by the bank's excellent profitability, as measured by its Return on Equity.
For banks, the P/TBV ratio is a critical valuation metric that compares the stock price to the bank's underlying net asset value. FBP's P/TBV is 1.71x, meaning investors are paying $1.71 for every dollar of the bank's tangible net worth. While this is higher than the peer average of around 1.1x to 1.5x, it is justified by FBP's superior profitability. The bank's Return on Equity is a very high 21.37%. A high ROE indicates that management is adept at generating profits from its asset base, which in turn warrants a higher P/TBV multiple. The strong alignment between a high return and a premium valuation is a positive sign.
The bank's high Return on Equity of 21.37% provides strong justification for its Price-to-Book ratio of 1.68x, indicating the market is appropriately valuing its high-quality earnings power.
A core principle of bank valuation is that institutions with higher and more consistent Return on Equity (ROE) deserve to trade at a higher premium to their book value. FBP exemplifies this principle. With a current ROE of 21.37%, the bank is a top performer in an industry where average ROE has been closer to the 11-13% range. This high level of profitability more than justifies its P/B ratio of 1.68x. In an environment where the 10-Year Treasury yield is around 4.5%, generating a return on equity over 21% is exceptional and signals strong management and a valuable franchise.
The stock's trailing P/E ratio of 9.93x appears low relative to the regional bank average and is supported by very strong recent earnings growth.
The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio is a key measure of what investors are willing to pay for a company's profits. FBP's P/E of 9.93x is below the regional banking industry's average of approximately 11.7x, suggesting it is cheaper than its peers. This valuation is particularly noteworthy given the bank's recent performance. In the most recent quarter, it reported EPS growth of 40%, a sign of powerful earnings momentum. While this rate is not sustainable long-term, it demonstrates the bank's current profitability, making the sub-10 P/E ratio look attractive.
The combination of a healthy 3.54% dividend yield and consistent share buybacks provides a strong and direct return of capital to shareholders.
First BanCorp. offers an attractive income profile. Its dividend yield of 3.54% is competitive with the regional bank average of around 3.31%. More importantly, this dividend is well-supported by earnings, with a conservative payout ratio of 35.13%. This indicates that less than 40% of profits are used to pay dividends, leaving ample capital for reinvestment and growth. Furthermore, the company has a strong track record of dividend growth, recently increasing its payout by 12.5%. In addition to dividends, FBP actively repurchases its own shares, as shown by a 2.88% buyback yield. The total shareholder yield (dividend yield + buyback yield) is therefore over 6%, which is a compelling return for investors.
Compared to its regional banking peers, FBP appears attractively valued, trading at a lower P/E ratio with a competitive dividend yield and superior profitability.
On a relative basis, FBP stands out. Its P/E ratio of 9.93x is a discount to the peer average of ~11.7x. Its dividend yield of 3.54% is slightly above the peer average of ~3.3%. While its P/TBV of 1.71x is above the industry average, this is a reflection of its high ROE (21.37%) which is significantly better than the industry norm. Finally, with a beta of 0.92, the stock is slightly less volatile than the overall market. This combination of a cheaper earnings multiple, a solid dividend, and best-in-class returns makes its valuation compelling relative to competitors.
The most significant risk for First BanCorp. (FBP) is its deep geographic concentration in Puerto Rico. The bank's fortunes are directly linked to the island's economic and fiscal health, which has a history of volatility and is susceptible to unique shocks. Future risks include the potential for severe hurricanes, which can disrupt business activity and damage the value of collateral backing its loans. Moreover, any renewed fiscal challenges for the Puerto Rican government or a continuation of long-term population decline could dampen loan demand and economic growth, directly impacting FBP's core market and growth prospects.
From a macroeconomic perspective, FBP faces significant challenges related to interest rates and credit quality. The bank's profitability hinges on its net interest margin (NIM)—the difference between the interest it earns on loans and what it pays for deposits. If the Federal Reserve begins to cut rates, the bank's earnings on its assets could fall faster than its funding costs, compressing its NIM. Conversely, if rates remain elevated, competition for deposits could intensify, driving up expenses. An economic recession in the U.S. or Puerto Rico would magnify these risks, likely leading to higher loan delinquencies and charge-offs as both consumers and businesses struggle to meet their debt obligations.
Finally, the competitive and regulatory landscape presents ongoing hurdles. FBP operates in a concentrated market, facing intense competition from its primary rival, Popular, Inc., as well as other local banks and credit unions. The rise of financial technology (fintech) companies also adds pressure, as these digital-first competitors can attract customers with innovative products and lower fees. On the regulatory front, the banking industry is always under scrutiny. Potential changes to capital requirements, consumer protection laws, or other regulations could increase compliance costs and potentially limit the bank's ability to lend or return capital to shareholders through dividends and buybacks.
Click a section to jump